Gender Differences in Salary and Promotion for Faculty in the Humanities 1977–95
By Donna K. Ginther, K. Hayes. The Journal of human resources, 2003
222 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f41c04200e82e54e72292e9533845cf2f8650242
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Education
Citations in the corpus
- Stay in the Game: Gender, Family Formation and Alternative Trajectories in the Academic Life Course (2009, unknown): “This finding is supported by Donna Ginther’s work, which suggests that measured respondent characteristics cannot account for why women still fare worse than men in securing tenure (Ginther 2001; Ginther and Hayes 2003; Ginther and Kahn 2004).”
- Buying science and selling science: gender differences in the market for commercial science (2007, background): “Ginther and Hayes (2003) illustrate the enduring gender gaps in salaries and promotion for cohorts in the humanities between 1977 and 1995, even after controlling for productivity and demographic factors.”
- Reducing the Endorsement of Sexism Using Experiential Learning (2014, background): “Sexism is manifest in the persistence of restrictive, limiting, and oppressive stereotypes (Jost & Kay, 2005), unequal pay and advancement rates (Ginther & Hayes, 2003), and sexual harassment (Hage, 2000).”
- Gender Differences in Executive Compensation and Job Mobility (2012, background): “Ginther and Hayes (1999, 2003), McDowell, Singell, and Ziliak (1999), and Ginther and Kahn (2004) compared the trajectories of male and female academic faculty in the social sciences and humanities, finding that women tend be paid less at any given rank and are also less likely to be promoted.”
- Glass Ceilings or Sticky Floors? Statistical Discrimination in a Dynamic Model of Hiring and Promotion (2008, unknown): “Ginther and Hayes (2003) look at data from the Survey of Doctorate Recipi-”