Self-injury.

By Matthew K. Nock. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2020

1,430 citations recorded by the source corpus.

People have engaged in self-injury-defined as direct and deliberate bodily harm in the absence of suicidal intent-for thousands of years; however, systematic research on this behavior has been lacking. Recent theoretical and empirical work on self-injury has significantly advanced the understanding of this perplexing behavior. Self-injury is most prevalent among adolescents and young adults, typically involves cutting or carving the skin, and has a consistent presentation cross-nationally. Behavioral, physiological, and self-report data suggest that the behavior serves both an intrapersonal function (i.e., decreases aversive affective/cognitive states or increases desired states) and an interpersonal function (i.e., increases social support or removes undesired social demands). There currently are no evidence-based psychological or pharmacological treatments for self-injury. This review presents an integrated theoretical model of the development and maintenance of self-injury that synthesizes prior empirical findings and proposes several testable hypotheses for future research.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Health, Insect Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f410472117008f26f6569f1da413bb596432ed1e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

  1. J. Dickson
  2. K. Jomar
  3. P. Taylor
  4. Rebecca L. Forrester
  5. Joseph C. Franklin
  6. Ujala Shahmalak
  7. J. Hooley
  8. K. Dhingra

In Health

  1. Joseph C. Franklin
  2. J. Hooley
  3. K. Dhingra

In Insect Science

  1. Joseph C. Franklin
  2. J. Hooley

Citations in the corpus