Prevalence of nonsuicidal self-injury in nonclinical samples: systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.
By S. Swannell, G. Martin, Andrew Page, P. Hasking, Nathan St John. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behaviour, 2014
1,436 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Emergency Medicine, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/31b14917fb9879b3dc69f080b62b7d045dda0ed5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Why Do People Hurt Themselves? A New Conceptual Model of Nonsuicidal Self-Injury (2018, neutral): “Finally, most studies find similar prevalence rates across countries (Giletta, Scholte, Engels, Ciairano, & Prinstein, 2012; Plener, Libal, Keller, Fegert, & Muehlenkamp, 2009; Swannell et al., 2014), although Plener et al.”
- A meta-analysis of the prevalence of different functions of non-suicidal self-injury. (2018, background): “NSSI is common, with a lifetime prevalence of 13 – 17% in adolescents and young adults (Swannell et al., 2014) and there is evidence to suggest that NSSI is associated with a range of psychological di ffi culties including depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder (Bentley et al., 2014).”