The Four-Function Model of Nonsuicidal Self-Injury

By Kate H Bentley, Matthew K. Nock, David H. Barlow. 2014

235 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Insect Science, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/70121693286a215490443e8c5779a58625e10e91

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. J. Dickson
2. K. Jomar
3. P. Taylor
4. Rebecca L. Forrester
5. Joseph C. Franklin
6. Ujala Shahmalak
7. J. Hooley
8. K. Dhingra

In Insect Science

1. Joseph C. Franklin
2. J. Hooley

In Molecular Biology

1. Joseph C. Franklin

Citations in the corpus

• Why Do People Hurt Themselves? A New Conceptual Model of Nonsuicidal Self-Injury (2018, result): “First, consistent with research on the affective and social functions of NSSI (Bentley et al., 2014; Nock & Prinstein, 2004), we posit that there are several factors that entice people to engage in NSSI; we consider these to be benefits of NSSI.”
• A meta-analysis of the prevalence of different functions of non-suicidal self-injury. (2018, background): “NSSI is common, with a lifetime prevalence of 13 – 17% in adolescents and young adults (Swannell et al., 2014) and there is evidence to suggest that NSSI is associated with a range of psychological di ffi culties including depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder (Bentley et al., 2014).”