Myth and Reality: A review of empirical studies on giftedness

By Albert Ziegler, Thomas Raul. 2000

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f3f195210f81a9579c08492fa981566f6cb2d283

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. H. Cheng
2. D. Hawes
3. Joan Ann Swanson
4. David Yun Dai
5. Maree J. Abbott

In Social Psychology

1. D. Hawes
2. David Yun Dai
3. Maree J. Abbott

Citations in the corpus

• Intellectual Giftedness and Psychopathology in Children and Adolescents (2016, background): “…process results in members who are functioning well in school (academically, behaviorally, and socially), potentially leading to participant selection bias in studies that underestimates the prevalence of intellectually gifted children with behavioral or other difficulties (Ziegler & Raul, 2000).”
• State of Research on Giftedness and Gifted Education: A Survey of Empirical Studies Published During 1998—2010 (April) (2011, background): “However, it does not mean that the field cannot develop a common research agenda and set up research priorities and more rigorous standards (Callahan & Moon, 2007; Ziegler & Raul, 2000).”