The projective perception of the social world: A building block of social comparison processes.

By Joachim I. Krueger. 2000

175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f31d39d863ba66c7f6242b296f9049f052096810

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Why conspiracy theories matter: A social psychological analysis (2018, background): “…process in which the observer, lacking more direct or objective information, relies on what they know about him/herself when making judgements about what other people might be thinking, feeling and doing when more reliable or objective information is missing (Ames, 2004; Krueger, 2000).”
A Conceptual Model of Social Entrepreneurial Intention Based on the Social Cognitive Career Theory (2016, background): “Moreover, intentions may still be the single best predictor of behavior, including entrepreneurial behavior (Ajzen, 1991; Davidsson, 1995; Krueger, 2000; Shephred and Krueger 2002; Linan et al., 2011).”
Superordinate identities and intergroup conflict: The ingroup projection model (2007, methodology): “The idea of ingroup projection follows the tradition of research on social projection and the well-known false consensus effect (Allport, 1924; Ross, Greene, & House, 1977; for reviews see Krueger, 2000, 2007; Marks & Miller, 1987; Mullen & Hu, 1988).”
Social Projection to Ingroups and Outgroups: A Review and Meta-Analysis (2005, unknown): “According to one view, people generate highly accurate group-judgments because they project from themselves while neglecting other valid information that is available about the group (Krueger, 2000).”
From social projection to social behaviour (2007, background): “Response time: Self-judgements are faster than group judgements (Clement & Krueger, 2000).”
When 'different' means 'worse': in-group prototypicality in changing intergroup contexts (2005, background): “Ingroup When "Different" Means 4 projection, just like social projection, probably reflects several motivational and cognitive processes (Krueger, 2000; Marks & Miller, 1987).”
The trouble with overconfidence. (2008, unknown): “We rely on abundant evidence showing that people use themselves as a useful, albeit imperfect basis for predicting others (Krueger, 2000; Krueger, Acevedo, & Robbins, 2005). which is between zero and one.”
Imagining intergroup contact promotes projection to outgroups (2008, background): “Projection is a cognitive attitudinal process that is integral to positive intergroup relations (Clement & Krueger, 2002; Krueger, 2000; Krueger & Zeiger, 1993; Riketta, 2006).”
Social categorization moderates social projection. (2002, background): “Thus, self-referent judgments facilitate group-referent judgments (i.e., consensus estimates) more than vice versa (Clement & Krueger, 2000).”