US consumers' willingness to pay for green electricity

By B. Roe. 2001

612 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f21759a217e17e2515efc753f1920f4d64e05a00

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Wind power development in Sweden: Global policies and local obstacles (2007, result): “The negative correlation between income and the probability of a positive attitude is somewhat unexpected, and is contradicted by the results from other studies [45–47].”
Can Environmental Regulations be Good for Business? An Assessment of the Porter Hypothesis (2005, background): “Price premiums for environmentally-friendly products Roe et al. (2001) ▪ Survey (joint analysis) 835 respondents.”
Are consumers willing to pay more for electricity from cooperatives? Results from an online Choice Experiment in Germany (2014, background): “…al. 2013).2 It is, thus, not surprising that much recent research on consumer electricity preferences has focused on WTP for renewable energy (e.g. Roe et al. 2001; Borchers et al. 2007; Scarpa and Willis 2010; Álvarez-Farizo and Hanley 2002; Dimitropoulos and Kontoleon 2009; Meyerhoff et al.…”
US State Policies for Renewable Energy: Context and Effectiveness (2011, positive): “This is consistent with the analyses of Green Power Demand, undertaken by Zarnikau (2003) and Roe et al. (2001) who conclude that disclosure policies have a positive and significant impact on consumers' willingness to pay for green power.”
Green vs. green: Measuring the compensation required to site electrical generation windmills in a viewshed (2008, methodology): “Roe et al. (2001) using a hedonic model find consumers are willing to pay a premium for renewable energy sources.”
The impact of government subsidies and enterprises’ R&D investment: A panel data study from renewable energy in China (2016, background): “…the effect of portfolio standards on climate and energy industry development in developed countries and regions, such as the United States (Menyah and Wolde-Rufael, 2010; Roe et al., 2001; Bang, 2010) and the European Union (Jacobsson et al., 2009; Haas et al., 2004; Reiche and Bechberger, 2004).”
CONSUMERS AND GREEN ELECTRICITY: PROFILING POTENTIAL PURCHASERS (2003, background): “While several studies have been undertaken to try to ascertain how much of a premium for green (or ‘greener’) electricity people would be willing to pay2 (e.g. Farhar, 1999; Roe et al., 2001), limited attention has been paid to the extent to which this subset of the general population is ‘different’”
Rural public acceptance of renewable energy deployment: The case of Shandong in China (Online first) (2013, result): “Similarly with previous studies [19,20,38], these results may make sense since young people could accept new things more easily and household income indeed is an important determinant of family energy expenditure (and willingness to pay more).”
The early adoption of green power by Dutch households : an empirical exploration of factors influencing the early adoption of green electricity for domestic purposes (2005, positive): “Using conjoint analysis, Roe et al. (2001) showed that several different demographic segments in the US market are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly electricity generation methods.”
Renewable energy policy design and framing influence public support in the United States (2017, background): “[28, 29] As politicians and advocates attempt to advance new renewable energy laws in the states, our results suggest careful consideration should be given to their framing and implementation. l l l l l l l l Democrats −0.50 −0.25 0.00 0.25 (c) l l l l l l l l Republicans −0.50 −0.25 0.00 0.25 0.50…”
The Green Bonds Premium Puzzle: The Role of Issuer Characteristics and Third-Party Verification (2019, background): “[14] found that investors are willing to receive a lower yield when emission reductions stem from the increased reliance upon renewable fuels, suggesting that several product features could help explain real price premiums.”
Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward rooftop photovoltaic installation: The roles of personal trait, psychological benefit, and government incentives (2020, background): “Second, Roe et al.(7) stated that the future success of green energy depends on effective branding and marketing communications strategies designed to enhance consumers’ perceptions of the benefits.”
Diffusion of environmentally-friendly energy technologies: buy versus lease differences in residential PV markets (2013, neutral): “…value for their PV system, it is not obvious what depth of information finding and analysis decision-makers go through to determine which REP provides this greatest value (Conlisk 1996, Fuchs and Arentsen 2002, Gigerenzer and Todd 1999, Goett et al 2000, Roe et al 2001, Tversky and Kahneman 1974).”