Renewable energy policy design and framing influence public support in the United States

287 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Climate change as a polarizing cue: Framing effects on public support for low-carbon energy policies (2018, background): “…the proposal has been explicitly championed by former high-level Republican officials (Schwartz, 2017), and other research has found that emissions-reduction policies that use market incentives, such as carbon pricing, are more acceptable across political parties (Stoutenborough et al., 2014).”
Combining climate, economic, and social policy builds public support for climate action in the US (2020, background): “Unsurprisingly, emphasizing either aggregate or individual costs reduces support (Ansolabehere and Konisky 2014, Stokes and Warshaw 2017).”
Mission, challenges, and prospects of renewable energy development in Vietnam (2021, unknown): “…in particular, which has often led the world in the support of renewable source-based energy technologies at both the state and federal level (Stokes and Warshaw 2017), saw a growth of 9% in the amount of electricity generated from renewable energy sources in 2016 with a renewable energy…”
The political logics of clean energy transitions (2018, methodology): “To further explicate and illustrate our framework, here we provide short case studies of policymaking at various stages of the experience curve: four at the top of the curve (Germany, Norway, United States, state of 38 Stokes and Breetz (2018); Stokes (2013); Stokes and Warshaw (2017).”