Relationship lending: a survey of the literature

By Elyas Elyasiani, Lawrence G. Goldberg. 2004

392 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Finance

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f210cb31459e557a8f91c2cff37d4e63e84420e4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. S. Carter
2. Martin Weber
3. Lars Norden
4. Colin Mason
5. W. Strange
6. Stuart S. Rosenthal
7. Mark Freel
8. Ross Brown

In Economics and Econometrics

1. W. Strange
2. Stuart S. Rosenthal
3. S. Carter
4. Colin Mason
5. Lars Norden
6. Martin Weber
7. Mark Freel
8. Gilles Duranton

In Finance

1. Martin Weber
2. Lars Norden
3. S. Carter
4. Colin Mason
5. W. Strange
6. Stuart S. Rosenthal
7. Mark Freel
8. Arindam Bandyopadhyay

Citations in the corpus

• Bank Market Power and SME Financing Constraints (2009, neutral): “less than four survey articles and studies have been published that are substantially or entirely devoted to the subject of relationship lending (Berger and Udell, 1998; Boot, 2000; Ongena and Smith, 2000; and Elyasiani and Goldberg, 2004 ).”
• Bank Size and Lending Relationships in Japan (2008, neutral): “See Boot (2000), Ongena and Smith (2000), and Elyasiani and Goldberg (2004), for survey.”
• Emergence of Financial Intermediaries in Electronic Markets: The Case of Online P2P Lending (2009, neutral): “This is fairly comparable to the stream of literature on relationship lending that emphasizes the exchange and evaluation of ‘‘soft information’’ within small banks (Petersen and Rajan 1994, Elyasiani and Goldberg 2004, Berger, Miller, Petersen, Rajan, and Stein 2005).”
• Observing unobservables: Identifying information asymmetries with a consumer credit field experiment (2005, neutral): “hidden type is revealed through the lending relationship ( Elyasiani and Goldberg 2004 ).”
• Credit Line Usage, Checking Account Activity, and Default Risk of Bank Borrowers (2010, positive): “Both variables are indicators of the intensity of the bank-borrower relationship and may also serve as proxies for the extent of asymmetric information in the bank relationship (Boot 2000; Elyasiani and Goldberg 2004).”
• Female Entrepreneurship, Agglomeration, and a New Spatial Mismatch (2012, result): “3 This would be consistent with literature on small business lending, which has documented that relationships between lenders and business owners facilitate access to credit (see Elyasiani & Goldberg, 2004, for a recent review).”
• The latent demand for bank debt: characterizing “discouraged borrowers” (2012, background): “Indeed, there is evidence from a variety of contexts to show that relationship banking reduces information asymmetries and is likely to be associated with a higher success rate in loan applications and more lending at the margins (Binks and Ennew 1997; Petersen and Rajan 1995; Elyasiani and Goldberg”
• Trading Partners in the Interbank Lending Market (2013, neutral): “6 For a detailed survey of the literature, see Elyasiani and Goldberg (2004), Boot (2000) and Onega and Smith (2000).”
• The Response of Firms' Investment and Financing to Adverse Cash Flow Shocks: The Role of Bank Relationships (2006, neutral): “1 See also Elyasiani and Goldberg (2004) for a survey.”