Sex differences in mental arithmetic, digit span, and g defined as working memory capacity

By Richard Lynn, P. Irwing. 2008

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Genetics, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f21081cbf128398af7d2f727c0f07c87ab9e31e4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. R. Engle
2. Nash Unsworth
3. Thomas S. Redick
4. M. Kane
5. J. Broadway
6. M. Meier
7. P. Kuriakose
8. Agata Syzmanowicz

In Statistics and Probability

1. Agata Syzmanowicz
2. Adrian Furnham
3. Nash Unsworth
4. M. Kane
5. R. Engle
6. Thomas S. Redick
7. Joan Meyers-Levy
8. B. Loken

Citations in the corpus

• Measuring Working Memory Capacity With Automated Complex Span Tasks (2012, result): “In addition, the automated CSTs show extremely small or no gender effects, in contrast to researchers who claim male advantages for WMC based on other types of measures (e.g., Lynn & Irwing, 2008).”
• Gender Differences in Self-Estimates of General, Mathematical, Spatial and Verbal Intelligence: Four Meta Analyses. (2011, background): “The disagreement that exists occurs over the size of the differences that exist with Lynn (1999) suggesting a 4–5 IQ point differences in adults in favour of males (Lynn, 1999) and effect sizes as high a d=.61 for mental arithmetic (Lynn, 1998; Lynn & Irwing, 2008).”