Motivational climate interventions in physical education: A meta-analysis

By R. Braithwaite, Christopher M. Spray, Victoria E. Warburton. 2011

216 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Objective The purpose of this study was to synthesize findings from motivational climate interventions employing Ames, 1992a , Ames, 1992b and Epstein, 1988 , Epstein, 1989 TARGET framework within school-based physical education contexts. Design The present study employed a quantitative research synthesis design. Meta-analysis uses empirical studies to summarize past research by drawing overall conclusions from separate investigations. This research design highlights important and unsolved issues related to motivational climate interventions within physical education. Methods Standard meta-analytic procedures incorporating inclusion and exclusion criteria, literature search, coding procedures, and statistical methods were used to identify and synthesize 22 studies with 24 independent samples. Cohen’s (1988) criteria for effect sizes were used to interpret and evaluate results. Results There was an overall small positive treatment effect ( g  = 0.103) for groups exposed to mastery motivational climates. Outcome analyses identified the most consistent and largest overall treatment effects for behavioral outcomes ( g  = 0.39–0.49) followed by affective outcomes ( g  = −0.27 to 0.59) and cognitive outcomes ( g  = −0.25 to 0.32). Moderator analyses were directed by study heterogeneity and identified several trends in intervention features and study features with the most substantial trend for participant features as elementary students had the largest overall treatment effect ( g  = 0.41). Conclusions Outcome and moderator analyses identified several trends in methodological features, participant features, and study features that should be addressed in future physical education motivational climate interventions.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Safety Research, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f1f753367b59cdae52738e10c0bbe9f4aec0e605

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

  1. T. Jaakkola
  2. Javier Fernández-Río
  3. Luis Santos
  4. Judith Fernandez-Cando
  5. N. Sanz

In Safety Research

  1. T. Jaakkola
  2. Javier Fernández-Río
  3. Vassilis Barkoukis
  4. J. Liukkonen
  5. Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis
  6. Martin S. Hagger

In Social Psychology

  1. T. Jaakkola
  2. Javier Fernández-Río
  3. Sami R. Yli-Piipari
  4. Luis Santos
  5. Judith Fernandez-Cando
  6. N. Sanz
  7. Vassilis Barkoukis
  8. J. Liukkonen

Citations in the corpus