Determinants of entrepreneurial engagement levels in Europe and the US

By Isabel Grilo, Roy Thurik. 2008

253 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f183233699abaf8bb90b0bbcd6de70a19cf4076c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

A new typology of micro-firm owner-managers (2015, background): “…objective expectations of success, nascent entrepreneurs, for example, show considerable reliance on subjective (and often biased) perceptions, which emphasises the growing importance of perceptual variables to measure entrepreneurial behaviour (Arenius and Minniti, 2005; Grilo and Thurik, 2008).”
The relevance of quantity and quality entrepreneurship for regional performance: the moderating role of the entrepreneurial ecosystem (2018, background): “Not all types of entrepreneurship are equally important (Grilo & Thurik, 2008).”
Institutions, Latent Entrepreneurship, and Self–Employment: An International Comparison (2012, background): “(Blanchflower et al., 2001; Crant, 1996; Grilo & Irigoyen, 2006; Grilo & Thurik, 2008; Matthews & Moser, 1996; Parker, 2004; Scherer, Adams, Carley, & Wiebe, 1989).”
Entrepreneurship and culture (2010, background): “Whereas a number of individually relevant determinants of entrepreneurship have been widely explored (Grilo and Thurik 2008; Parker 2009), differences across countries remain unexplored.”
Gender gap in latent and nascent entrepreneurship: driven by competitiveness (2013, methodology): “The Flash EB Entrepreneurship 2009 and previous waves of this survey are used in other empirical studies (e.g. Gohmann 2012; Grilo and Thurik 2005; Grilo and Thurik 2008; Verheul et al. 2012; van der Zwan et al. 2012).”
Explaining preferences and actual involvement in self-employment: Gender and the entrepreneurial personality (2012, background): “…to as latent or nascent entrepreneurship (Blanchflower, Oswald, & Stutzer, 2001; Masuda, 2006; Van Gelderen, Thurik, & Bosma, 2005).2 These stages of entrepreneurship may again have different antecedents (Davidsson & Honig, 2003; Grilo & Thurik, 2005b, 2008; Van der Zwan, Thurik, & Grilo, 2010).”
Determinants of job satisfaction: a European comparison of self-employed and paid employees (2011, unknown): “Lastly, we only focus on entrepreneurship in terms of self-employment and do not consider other approaches that define entrepreneurs as a heterogeneous group such as: (i) innovative against imitative entrepreneurs (Schumpeter, 1912); (ii) opportunity against necessity entrepreneurs (Reynolds, Camp, ”
Entrepreneurial education and learning at universities: exploring multilevel contingencies (2017, background): “Most studies find that men have a higher probability of engaging in entrepreneurship than women (Grilo and Thurik 2008).”
Education and entrepreneurial choice: An instrumental variables analysis (2010, unknown): “Moreover, of the many factors known to influence entrepreneurial choice and performance (Evans and Jovanovic, 1989; Le, 1999; Lévesque et al., 2002; Grilo and Thurik, 2008; Parker, 2009; Roper and Scott, 2009; Sena et al., 2010), education is popular among politicians, since it can be influenced.”
Entrepreneurial aspirations, motivations, and their drivers (2008, background): “Fourth, there are multinomial logit-type investigations explaining the odds of being in a certain stage of the entrepreneurial process vis-à-vis not considering selfemployment at all (Grilo and Thurik 2008).”
Drivers of entrepreneurial aspirations at the country level: the role of start-up motivations and social security (2007, background): “Future research could incorporate other entrepreneurial engagement levels (Grilo and Thurik 2008).”