Social Intuitionists Answer Six Questions About Morality

By Jonathan Haidt, F. Björklund. 2007

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f0638c47c5b9029ec8499e5bb1639a30fc9bd50b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

What is moral reasoning? (2015, background): “…generally referred to as Two Systems or Dual-Process views, and many moral psychologists employ the distinction between System 1 processes and System 2 processes and identify moral reasoning as a System 2-type process (Craigie, 2011; Haidt & Bjorklund, 2008a; Kennett & Fine, 2009; Saunders, 2009).”
Moral Development in Business Ethics: An Examination and Critique (2019, background): “Haidt’s main proposition is that intuition trumps reasoning in moral processing 1 3 (Haidt and Bjorklund 2007).”
Organizational Reputation: A Review (2011, background): “…favorability assessments of a given organization is consistent with a common theme in psychology—that humans engage in continuous and intuitive evaluative processes whereby environmental stimuli are sorted into approach–avoidance (good–bad) categories (for a review, see Haidt & Bjorklund, 2007).”
Shame on Who? The Effects of Corporate Irresponsibility and Social Performance on Organizational Reputation (2019, unknown): “an incident is considered as personally threatening to the evaluator or their own values and belief systems (Donaldson and Dunfee, 1999; Haidt and Bjorklund, 2008).”
Morality (2008, background): “…consciousness, or at the fringe of consciousness, of an evaluative feeling (like-dislike, good-bad) about the character or actions of a person, without any conscious awareness of having gone through steps of search, weighing evidence, or inferring a conclusion’’ (Haidt & Bjorklund, 2008, p. 188).”