Towards responsible use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by the healthy

817 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Intelligence: new findings and theoretical developments. (2012, background): “…in attention, working memory, and executive function in healthy, normal adults have been found with a variety of stimulant drugs, with Modafinil, which is approved for the treatment of narcolepsy, and with Aricept, which is approved for use for Alzheimer's disease (Greely et al., 2008).”
The Neuroscience of Intelligence (2016, background): “The journal Nature published a commentary about ethical issues concerning putative cognitive-enhancing (CE) drugs in 2007 (Sahakian & Morein-Zamir, 2007) and a 2008 commentary (Greely et al., 2008) based on an informal survey of 1,400 scientists from 60 countries about their use of such drugs (Maher”
Public Attitudes Toward Cognitive Enhancement (2014, background): “The essence of the argument regarding authenticity is that using technology to enhance represents a shortcut to success, and thus, achievements obtained using CE are not fully authentic [5, 6, 74, 80, 81].”
My Mind Is Mine!? Cognitive Liberty as a Legal Concept (2013, background): “This issue is beyond the scope of this chapter, but let me briefly remark that worries over NEs rendering a (by large) fair situation unfair overlook the fact that natural processes and social conditions do not distribute “mental wealth” and opportunities in accordance with any theory of justice (Sa”