Two Cultures: Undergraduate Academic Engagement

By S. Brint, Allison M Cantwell, Robert A. Hannerman. 2008

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee1fe591ac85d29e0ef2853282610c4206b4ee9c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Stuart R. Palmer
2. P. Hagel
3. R. Carr
4. E. Kahu
5. Karen Nelson
6. Rosemary L. Fisher

Citations in the corpus

• Framing student engagement in higher education (2013, background): “Teaching and learning differ by discipline with a distinction often made between the ‘soft’ disciplines, such as humanities, where there is less consensus of knowledge, and the ‘hard’ disciplines, such as natural sciences and engineering, where there is greater agreement about both content and metho”
• Active learning: The importance of developing a comprehensive measure (2015, methodology): “Others have observed that the level of student engagement as measured by instruments like the NSSE/AUSSE varies depending upon the discipline of study (e.g. Brint et al., 2008).”