Rethinking Regional Innovation and Change: Path Dependency or Regional Breakthrough?

By G. Fuchs, Philip Shapira. 2005

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee162bfe78ea87ac738fa270cb4353cdd604df78

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Koen Frenken
2. E. Stam
3. Georg Schreyögg
4. J. Sydow
5. Ron A. Boschma
6. G. Macleod
7. Jochen Koch
8. Elena Cefis

Citations in the corpus

• Industrial Dynamics and Clusters: A Survey (2015, background): “Interest in the evolution of clusters has grown rapidly over the last decade, as evidenced by case studies collected in various books (CURZIO and FORTIS, 2002; BRESHNAHAN and GAMBARDELLA, 2004; FUCHS and SHAPIRA, 2005; BRAUNERHJELM and FELDMAN, 2006; FORNAHL et al., 2010).”
• Organizational Path Dependence: Opening the Black Box (2009, background): “Creative agency and the power of generating momentum are seen as basic ingredients for path creation, although entrepreneurship, as influenced by its own history and important institutions, may well also be a source of path dependence (Staber, 2005).”
• An evolutionary integrated view of Regional Systems of Innovation: Concepts, measures and historical perspectives (2005, unknown): “(Boschma, 2004).”
• The Place of Path Dependence in an Evolutionary Perspective on the Economic Landscape (2010, unknown): “…and self-reinforcing growth of ‘high-tech’ clusters (see, for example, Grahber, 1993; Storper, 1995; Storper, 1997; Cooke and Morgan, 1998; Bode, 2001; Kenney and von Burg, 2001; Boschma, 2004, 2005; Bathelt and Boggs, 2003; Fuchs and Shapira, 2005; Gertler, 2005; Hassink, 2005a and 2005b).”
• Advancing Evolutionary Economic Geography by Engaged Pluralism (2014, background): “…in special issues (BOSCHMA and MARTIN, 2007; GRABHER, 2009; HASSINK and SHIN, 2005), in edited books (FRENKEN, 2007; BOSCHMA and MARTIN, 2010; SHAPIRA and FUCHS, 2005), in workshops, such as in Cambridge and Jena (at the Max Planck Institute of Economics), as well as at special sessions at…”
• Learning in Projects, Remembering in Networks? (2004, background): “The practice of temporary and episodic collaboration, phrased differently, relies on an intricate project ecology (Grabher, 2002b; 2003) of enduring ties and institutions.”