Assessing the predictive validity of cultural intelligence over time

By C. Ward, J. Wilson, Ronald Fischer. 2011

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/edc52ff76b32b7773a8e2884ffd9773d99b46290

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Robert L. Engle
2. Kerri Anne Crowne
3. Jiun-Shiu Chen
4. Al S. Lovvorn

In Education

1. Robert L. Engle
2. Kerri Anne Crowne

In Social Psychology

1. Robert L. Engle
2. Kerri Anne Crowne

Citations in the corpus

• Measuring cultural intelligence (CQ) (2015, unknown): “Ward et al., 2011 New Zealand 104 international students from 25 countries in New Zealand university Cronbach's alphas of MC, COG, MOT, and BEH are .80, .82, .76, and 78 respectively.”
• The impact of cultural intelligence on communication effectiveness, job satisfaction and anxiety for Chinese host country managers working for foreign multinationals (2014, unknown): “…ni ve rs ite it N ijm eg en ] at 0 3: 29 1 3 M ay 2 01 4 the CQ scale, a number of empirical studies have been conducted to further the development of a CQ theory (Elenkov and Manev 2009; Ward et al. 2009; Ramalu et al. 2010; Groves and Feyerherm 2011; MacNab and Worthley 2011; Ward et al. 2011).”
• The impact of international experience on cultural intelligence: an application of contact theory in a structured short-term programme (2014, background): “…2009; Dagher 2010; Engle, Dimitriadi, and Sadrieh 2012; Engle and Nehrt 2012; Groves and Feyerherm 2011; Moon 2010; Shannon and Begley 2008; Tarique and Takeuchi 2008; Ward, Fischer, Lam and Hall 2009; Ward, Wilson, and Fischer 2011) and is considered well-established (Ang, Van Dyne, and Tan 2011).”