Characteristics of patent litigation: a window on competition
By J. Lanjouw, Mark Schankerman. 2001
856 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ec999ef311975966eecd6681ade618ea4c97acda
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Dietmar Harhoff
- Dirk Czarnitzki
- Scott Stern
- K. Hussinger
- David H. Hsu
- Rajshree Agarwal
- Alberto Galasso
- Cédric Schneider
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Dietmar Harhoff
- David H. Hsu
- Scott Stern
- Rajshree Agarwal
- Joshua S. Gans
- Alberto Galasso
- Rosemarie H. Ziedonis
- M. Reitzig
Citations in the corpus
- Improving patent valuations for management purposes--validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales (2004, background): “Forward citations had been introduced by Trajtenberg (1990)and had been validated as indicators of patent value in numerous subsequent surveys, e.g. by Albert et al. (1991), Harhoff et al. (2003), Lanjouw and Schankerman (2001), andHarhoff and Reitzig (2002).”
- Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators (2004, background): “This is also true of backward citations, although large numbers of citations to others also suggests that the particular innovation is likely to be more derivative in nature (Lanjouw and Schankerman, 2001).”
- How Firms Capture Value From Their Innovations (2013, background): “An extensive theoretical and empirical literature notes that the patent mechanism is costly to create and enforce and does not necessarily guarantee the patent holder expected profits from an innovation (Lanjouw & Schankerman, 2001; Somaya, 2003).”
- The Impact of Uncertain Intellectual Property Rights on the Market for Ideas: Evidence from Patent Grant Delays (2008, background): “confront a full judicial review of their underlying validity or their legal scope (Lanjouw and Schankerman, 2001).”
- Determinants of opposition against EPO patent grants—the case of biotechnology and pharmaceuticals (2004, background): “patent litigation by Lanjouw and Schankerman (2001) , we find that the effect of the scope variable (number of different four-digit SIC codes) is negative and quite small.”
- Patents and the Survival of Internet-related IPOs (2007, neutral): “13 12 Lanjouw & Schankerman ( 2001 ) argue that this measure is superior to simple counts of forward citations .”