Management simulations: determining their effectiveness

By Henry Adobor, A. Daneshfar. 2006

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ea26a40d52582d8b9b6ca029244eea08559d9024

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Mehdi Farashahi
2. Shalini Rahul Tiwari
3. Omkumar Krishnan
4. Lubna Nafees
5. Mahdi Tajeddin

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Mehdi Farashahi
2. Eduardo Salas
3. Shalini Rahul Tiwari
4. Omkumar Krishnan
5. Lubna Nafees
6. Jessica L. Wildman
7. Ronald F. Piccolo
8. Mahdi Tajeddin

Citations in the corpus

• Simulation as a pedagogical tool: Measurement of impact on perceived effective learning (2014, methodology): “Most of the leading business schools have introduced simulationworkshops or incorporated it as part of different courses offered to students (Abodor & Daneshfar, 2006).”
• Effectiveness of teaching methods in business education: A comparison study on the learning outcomes of lectures, case studies and simulations (2018, background): “Theoretical and empirical studies have explored the advantage and disadvantages of simulation in comparison with either case study or lecture (e.g. Adobor & Daneshfar, 2006; Coffey & Anderson, 2006; Matlay, Tunstall, & Lynch, 2010; Pittaway & Cope, 2007; Tompson & Dass, 2000).”
• Using Simulation-Based Training to Enhance Management Education (2009, background): “In accordance with this, many critiques and reviews regarding management and business simulations have been produced (e.g., Adobor & Daneshfar, 2006; Faria & Nulsen, 1996; Fripp, 1997; Lean, Moizer, Towler, & Abbey, 2006; Romme & Putzel, 2003; Summers, 2004).”