Working hard and hardly working: domestic labor and marital satisfaction among dual-earner couples

By D. Stevens, G. Kiger, P. J. Riley. 2001

183 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e9f615dde723beab63954ddb8c33d91eb1ce2ac7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Krista Lynn Minnotte
2. E. Jeffrey Hill
3. Deniz Yucel
4. Daphne E. Pedersen
5. Beth A. Latshaw

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Krista Lynn Minnotte
2. L. Koch
3. M. Clarke
4. E. Jeffrey Hill
5. Deniz Yucel
6. Daphne E. Pedersen
7. Beth A. Latshaw
8. Sarah June Carroll

Citations in the corpus

• His and Her Perspectives: Gender Ideology, Work-to-Family Conflict, and Marital Satisfaction (2010, methodology): “This version of the scale has been used in other published studies (Minnotte et al. 2007; Stevens et al. 2001 ).”
• The Work‐Family Interface: Differentiating Balance and Fit (2004, background): “Perceived unfairness and/or dissatisfaction with the division of household chores has been shown to negatively impact a series of work-family outcomes, including marital satisfaction, psychological distress, and success in balancing work and family life (Erdwin et al., 2001; Hochschild, 1989; Steven”
• Spillover and Crossover Effects of Work-Family Conflict among Married and Cohabiting Couples (2018, background): “…and crossover effects of WFC and FWC might be more negatively related to our outcomes when couples have a more unequal division of household labor (Stevens, Kiger, and Riley 2001) and possess a more egalitarian gender ideology (Minnotte et al. 2010), when families have greater child care…”