Characterizing the importance of habitat patches and corridors in maintaining the landscape connectivity of a Pholidoptera transsylvanica (Orthoptera) metapopulation

By Ferenc Jordán, A. Báldi, K. Orci, István Rácz, Zoltán Varga. Landscape Ecology, 2003

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e9707421d99ff22a50394feebb23820d99c3535f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Genetics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Urban green space network development for biodiversity conservation: Identification based on graph theory and gravity modeling (2010, background): “…habitat fragments, ecologists and conservation biologists recommend maintaining habitat connectivity by preserving corridors that permit movement of species between remaining habitats and by developing urban green space networks (e.g., Jordán et al., 2003; Parker et al., 2008; Esbah et al., 2009).”
The Eco-field Hypothesis: Toward a Cognitive Landscape (2005, background): “Moreover, great attention has been focused by ecologists on emerging properties of the landscape including connectivity, fragmentation, presence of edges and corridors (f.i. Wiens 1995; Danielson and Hubbard 2000; Nicholls et al. 2001; Mabry and Barrett 2002; Baudry et al. 2003; Jordan et al. 2003),”
A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning : Comparison with existing indices and application to a case study (2007, background): “1), because their loss causes remnant parts of habitat to be isolated from each other (pij = 0 between the habitat patches belonging to different parts of the landscape) (Keitt et al., 1997; Jordán et al., 2003; Pascual-Hortal and Saura, 2006).”
Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. (2008, methodology): “Or, metrics derived from shortest-path or least-cost distances, such as the Harary index (Ricotta et al. 2000, Jordán et al. 2003) or the integral index of connectivity (Pascual- Hortal and Saura 2006) could be modified by substituting resistance distances for least-cost distances in their…”
Living in the branches: population dynamics and ecological processes in dendritic networks. (2007, background): “…advances in spatially structured networks focus primarily on the development of statistical indices of network properties (Newman 2003) that contribute to large-scale connectivity and, therefore, to networklevel persistence of populations (e.g. Jordán et al. 2003; Pascual-Hortal & Saura 2006).”
Integrating landscape connectivity in broad-scale forest planning through a new graph-based habitat availability methodology: application to capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) in Catalonia (NE Spain) (2006, background): “…of connectivity indices in the literature (Hanski 1994; Bunn et al. 2000; Ricotta et al. 2000; Urban and Keitt 2001; Moilanen and Nieminen 2002; Jordan et al. 2003; Calabrese and Fagan 2004), many of them have been found to present serious limitations that make them inadequate for effectively…”
A comparison of metrics predicting landscape connectivity for a highly interactive species along an urban gradient in Colorado, USA (2008, background): “Few studies have used empirical data on wildlife distribution to evaluate the performance of connectivity metrics, though these comparisons are needed (Tischendorf and Fahrig 2000; but see Moilanen and Nieminen 2002; Jordan et al. 2003; Saura and Pascual-Hortal 2007).”
Review of the Methods Frequently Used to Estimate the Abundance of Orthoptera in Grassland Ecosystems (2005, background): “Recently, however, bioacoustic techniques have been employed to automatically recognise grasshopper species from their stridulation (Riede 1998; Chesmore 2001; Chesmore and Nellenbach 2001; Jordan et al. 2003; Schwenker et al. 2003; Chesmore 2004; Chesmore and Ohya 2004).”
A Graph‐Theory Framework for Evaluating Landscape Connectivity and Conservation Planning (2008, background): “At times a high level of connectivity is desirable (Jordan et al. 2003), whereas at others it can be detrimental (Condeso & Meentemeyer 2007).”
Conefor Sensinode 2.2: A software package for quantifying the importance of habitat patches for landscape connectivity (2009, background): “Graph structures and algorithms have been shown to be a powerful and effective way of both representing the landscape pattern as a network of functionally interconnected patches and performing complex analysis regarding landscape connectivity (Chetkiewicz et al., 2006; Jordán et al., 2003; Pascual-H”
Motivations for Conserving Urban Biodiversity (2010, background): “In particular, the functionality of stepping stones can be broken by the loss of a single green space (Jordan et al. 2003).”