A comparison of metrics predicting landscape connectivity for a highly interactive species along an urban gradient in Colorado, USA

By S. Magle, David M. Theobald, K. Crooks. Landscape Ecology, 2008

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/730edab1993aff8c6086ba99a70ebc4f4e1725b6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Marie-Josée Fortin
2. K. Zeller
3. Andrew R Whiteley
4. Andrew Fall
5. B. Rayfield
6. K. McGarigal
7. Samuel A. Cushman
8. L. Fahrig

In Genetics

1. Andrew Fall
2. Marie-Josée Fortin
3. K. Zeller
4. B. Rayfield
5. K. McGarigal
6. Andrew R Whiteley

Citations in the corpus

• Connectivity for conservation: a framework to classify network measures. (2011, methodology): “Good examples of this include dispersal flux (Urban and Keitt 2001) and the modified incidence function (Magle et al. 2009), which are derived from metapopulation theory, and effective resistance (McRae et al. 2008), which is expressly linked to random walk theory.”
• Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review (2012, background): “1, then re-assessment may take place to reduce variability (Magle et al. 2009).”