Conefor Sensinode 2.2: A software package for quantifying the importance of habitat patches for landscape connectivity
By Santiago Saura, Josep Torné. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2009
839 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e46207f56a17daa812bfff9484ed2b1a866197da
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Marie-Josée Fortin
- Santiago Saura
- S. R. Floeter
- R. Khosravi
- Ö. Bodin
- Mahmoud Hemami
- C. E. Ferreira
- L. Rubio
In Global and Planetary Change
- Marie-Josée Fortin
- S. R. Floeter
- Ö. Bodin
- C. E. Ferreira
- Santiago Saura
- Thierry Tormos
- K. Looy
- Y. Souchon
Citations in the corpus
- The flickering connectivity system of the north Andean páramos (2019, positive): “Conefor Sensinode 2.2 software and ESRI ArcGIS 10.3 were used to calculate the straight-line distances between islands, the PC and ECA (Saura & Pascual-Hortal, 2007; Saura & Torné, 2009).”
- Ranking individual habitat patches as connectivity providers: Integrating network analysis and patch removal experiments (2010, methodology): “, 2006) and onefor Sensinode (Saura and Torné, 2009) (www.”
- Construction and optimization of an ecological network based on morphological spatial pattern analysis and circuit theory (2020, methodology): “The Conefor software package, which can calculate the dPCs, was used to evaluate the importance of the core patches (Saura and Torné 2009) as follows:”
- The pond network: can structural connectivity reflect on (amphibian) biodiversity patterns? (2011, methodology): “The landscape analysis was made using the freeware Conefor Sensinode 2.2-CS22 (Saura and Torné 2009) and using the author’s recommended binary connectivity index: integral index of connectivity (IIC) (Pascual-Hortal and Saura 2006).”
- A common currency for the different ways in which patches and links can contribute to habitat availability and connectivity in the landscape (2010, methodology): “The values of dPCk and DPCk and the values of the three dPCk and DPCk fractions were calculated for each of the patches and links within each habitat and for each dispersal distance by using a modified version of the Conefor Sensinode software (Saura and Torné 2009, /”
- A blueprint for securing Brazil's marine biodiversity and supporting the achievement of global conservation goals (2020, methodology): “Conefor Sensinode 2.2: A software package for quantifying the importance of habitat patches for landscape connectivity.”
- Multispecies assessment of core areas and connectivity of desert carnivores in central Iran (2018, methodology): “The relative importance of each identified core patch to total landscape connectivity was assessed using Conefor 2.2 (CS22; Saura & Torné, 2009).”
- Spatial statistics, spatial regression, and graph theory in ecology (2012, methodology): “An alternative solution is to use statistical approaches to select the most appropriate scales (Jombart et al., 2009) such as significance testing of wavelet decompositions using null models (Torrence and Compo, 1998; James et al., 2011b).”
- Disentangling dam impacts in river networks (2014, methodology): “The 253 ConeforSensinode 2.2 software (Saura and Torné, 2009) was used to calculate the dIICvalues.”