Living in the branches: population dynamics and ecological processes in dendritic networks.

By Evan H. Campbell Grant, W. Lowe, William F. Fagan. Ecology Letters, 2007

688 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/423a219ddcdffc0d2dc4f5f1f5ea7de8d787f5d5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. G. Grenouillet
2. L. Buisson
3. N. Bonada
4. Julian D. Olden
5. Fabien Leprieur
6. J. Heino
7. Sovan Lek
8. S. Brosse

In Ecology

1. G. Grenouillet
2. J. Heino
3. Julian D. Olden
4. L. Buisson
5. S. Brosse
6. N. Bonada
7. Fabien Leprieur
8. Luis Mauricio Bini

In Global and Planetary Change

1. H. Ernstson
2. Ö. Bodin
3. G. Grenouillet
4. L. Buisson
5. J. Heino
6. T. Elmqvist
7. Adriano S. Melo
8. J. Soininen

Citations in the corpus

• Dispersal strength determines meta‐community structure in a dendritic riverine network (2015, background): “These features may include the dendritic structure of stream networks (Fausch et al., 2002; Benda et al., 2004), the spatial arrangement of suitable habitat patches across the landscape (Campbell Grant et al., 2007; Er}os et al., 2012; Phillipsen & Lytle, 2013), and the simple Euclidean distance bet”
• River network properties shape α‐diversity and community similarity patterns of aquatic insect communities across major drainage basins (2013, background): “, 2012), but their combined effect with dispersal on large-scale diversity patterns is unknown (Grant et al., 2007; Muneepeerakul et al., 2008).”
• Genes in Streams: Using DNA to Understand the Movement of Freshwater Fauna and Their Riverine Habitat (2009, background): “Indeed, the SHM seems to foreshadow the formal recognition of the “dendritic ecological network” (Grant et al. 2007), in which all major ecological processes occur throughout the fractal-like branching network, which has elements of selfsimilarity across hierarchical scales.”
• Network analysis in conservation biogeography: challenges and opportunities (2010, background): “…is to develop a singly synthesis that links the spatial patterns of habitat patches in fragmented landscapes or dendritic aquatic systems (Campbell Grant et al., 2007), the parallel networks of interacting species using those patches, and community-level interactions as defined by metacommunity…”
• Effects of connectivity, dispersal directionality and functional traits on the metacommunity structure of river benthic diatoms (2013, background): “Indeed, contrary to the ‘classical’ metacommunities, branches of rivers do not only provide connections between interacting local communities, they form the prime habitat themselves (Grant et al., 2007).”
• Climate change hastens the turnover of stream fish assemblages (2008, background): “However, freshwater fish could be even more highly vulnerable to broad-scale environmental changes, because their dispersal ability is constrained by the network structure of the drainage basins (Grant et al., 2007).”
• Conservation biogeography of freshwater fishes: recent progress and future challenges (2010, methodology): “…terrestrial landscape connectivity, only recently we have witnessed advancements in the aquatic realm in terms of conceptual understanding (Campbell Grant et al., 2007), index development (e.g., Olden et al., 2001; Cote et al., 2009) and appropriate statistical methodologies (Peterson et al.,…”
• Integrating dispersal proxies in ecological and environmental research in the freshwater realm (2017, background): “101 Individual sites in freshwater ecosystems are often inherently connected (Tonn and 102 Magnuson 1982; Palmer et al. 1996; Magnuson et al. 1998; Jackson et al. 2001; Olden et al. 103 2001; Grant et al. 2007; Altermatt 2013).”