Decision Analysis And Behavioral Research

By A. Schwartz. 2016

419 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e937d44dff68127646d526b66b38d81375c4ace7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making--An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force. (2016, methodology): “, using “bisection” and “difference” methods [51,52]).”
Revisiting the corporate social performance‐financial performance link: A replication of waddock and graves (2016, methodology): “The weights of these eight dimensions were generated by the simple multi-attribute rating technique (SMART; Von Winterfeldt and Edwards, 1986).”
Specific character of objective methods for determining weights of criteria in MCDM problems: Entropy, CRITIC and SD (2021, methodology): “These are such methods as the direct ranking method (DR) (Goodwin & Wright, 1998; Roberts & Goodwin, 2002; Von Winterfeldt & Edwards, 1986), the point allocation (PA) method (Doyle et al., 1997; Roberts & Goodwin, 2002), the ranking method (Ahn & Park, 2008; Barron, 1992, 1996; Roberts & Goodwin, 20”
Personality and Risk Taking (2015, background): “…utility function that is derived from a series of choices, “ those who coined the term risk aversion had in mind the psychological interpretation that someone who prefers the expected value of a gamble over playing the gamble does not like to take risks ” (von Winterfeldt and Edwards, 1986: 256).”
Generation expansion planning optimisation with renewable energy integration: A review (2017, background): “It then evaluates the alternatives and assigns weights with the purpose of trade-off between attributes [31].”
Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method (2015, methodology): “We are developing some more (business, and psychological) experiments to study other features of BWM such as the behavioral aspects [44] of the BWM, and comparing its underlying behavioral principles to some other MCDM methods that have similarities to BWM, such as swing weighting method [45], SMART”
A New Model for Determining Weight Coefficients of Criteria in MCDM Models: Full Consistency Method (FUCOM) (2018, methodology): “The compensatory methods most commonly used are: (1) the trade-off method [7], which discovers the decision-maker’s dilemmas through a pairwise examination of criteria; (2) the swing method [8], which implies the construction of the two extreme hypothetical scenarios W and B, where the first (W) pre”
Public acceptance and preferences related to renewable energy and grid expansion policy: Empirical insights for Germany (2016, unknown): “On this basis, we calculated weights (normalised to sum up to one) as in SWING weighting [40,41].”