Dragan Pamucar

Management Science and Operations Research · 2015–2020

A researcher in the Science corpus: 9 papers; trusts 26 researchers and is trusted by 7 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Management Science and Operations Research — 65 citations into it; #3,560 of 11,946 by trust here, #3,153 by citations
• Strategy and Management — 35 citations into it; #3,550 of 10,874 by trust here, #5,919 by citations
• Control and Systems Engineering — 20 citations into it; #4,830 of 8,257 by trust here, #6,083 by citations
• Management Information Systems — 14 citations into it
• Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering — 11 citations into it; #862 of 2,521 by trust here, #1,622 by citations
• Management of Technology and Innovation — 11 citations into it
• Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law — 10 citations into it; #2,334 of 2,821 by trust here, #1,948 by citations
• Statistics and Probability — 10 citations into it

Whom Dragan Pamucar trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Jafar Rezaei
2. Sen Guo
3. Qing Li
4. Metin Dagdeviren
5. A. Culyer
6. Amos Tversky
7. Gülçin Büyüközkan
8. Zeki Ayag
9. Orlando Durán
10. Serafim Opricovic

Who trusts Dragan Pamucar overall

1. Xindong Peng
2. G. Odu
3. Irik Z. Mukhametzyanov
4. Ivan K. Petrovic
5. Yong Yang
6. Mirko Stojčić
7. Goran Ćirović
8. Wojciech Sałabun
9. Željko Stević
10. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas

Papers from Dragan Pamucar's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Dragan Pamucar trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS (European Journal of Operational Research)
2. Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method
3. Analytic Hierarchy Process
4. Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model
5. Decision Analysis And Behavioral Research
6. A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers (Expert systems with applications)
7. Pythagorean Fuzzy Choquet Integral Based MABAC Method for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making (International Journal of Intelligent Systems)
8. A Fuzzy AHP Approach to Evaluating Machine Tool Alternatives (Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing)
9. A new fuzzy additive ratio assessment method (ARAS‐F). Case study: The analysis of fuzzy multiple criteria in order to select the logistic centers location
10. Application of the GIS-DANP-MABAC multi-criteria model for selecting the location of wind farms: A case study of Vojvodina, Serbia

Their papers

• Location Selection for Wind Farms Using GIS Multi-Criteria Hybrid Model: An Approach Based on Fuzzy and Rough Numbers (2017) — 139 citations
• The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC) (2015) — 977 citations
• Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of alternatives and ranking according to COmpromise solution (MARCOS) (2020) — 1,162 citations
• Application of the GIS-DANP-MABAC multi-criteria model for selecting the location of wind farms: A case study of Vojvodina, Serbia (2017) — 314 citations
• A New Model for Determining Weight Coefficients of Criteria in MCDM Models: Full Consistency Method (FUCOM) (2018) — 753 citations
• Sustainable supplier selection: A novel integrated fuzzy best worst method (F-BWM) and fuzzy CoCoSo with Bonferroni (CoCoSo’B) multi-criteria model (2020) — 361 citations
• A New Fuzzy MARCOS Method for Road Traffic Risk Analysis (2020) — 296 citations
• Application of MCDM Methods in Sustainability Engineering: A Literature Review 2008-2018 (2019) — 310 citations
• Modification of the Best-Worst and MABAC methods: A novel approach based on interval-valued fuzzy-rough numbers (2018) — 314 citations