Gender, managerial level, transformational leadership and work satisfaction
By T. T. Manning. 2002
126 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e92b05907208168abce4d3c617274c455b18aca4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Transformational Leadership and Innovative Work Behaviour: Exploring the Relevance of Gender Differences (2008, unknown): “This paper assumes that such a specification would yield similar results, as transformational leadership can be seen as an androgynous form of leadership, thus not yielding an advantage to either men or women with respect to the form of leadership (van Engen, 2001; Manning 2002).”
- Leadership Across Cultures: Attachment Style Influences (2003, background): “…in emotional intelligence, may have more managerial self-awareness, or congruence between their leadership ratings and those of 27 observers (Sosik & Megerian, 1999), even securely attached managers who are younger, less senior or from minority groups may underrate themselves (e.g. Manning, 2002).”
- Transformational Leadership and Job Satisfaction in the Banking Sector: A Review (2014, background): “Manning (2002) found no significant differences in transformational leadership between male and female bank managers at equivalent levels, whether leadership was self-rated or observer-rated.”