Intergroup Emotions: Emotion as an Intergroup Phenomenon.

By D. Mackie, L. A. Silver, Eliot R. Smith. 2004

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e8bf1896e639f741e78dbeefa6f328b04ac285d1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Can emotions be truly group level? Evidence regarding four conceptual criteria. (2007, methodology): “As argued by Mackie et al. (2004), a corollary is that group-level emotions find their function in regulating group members’ attitudes and behavior in relation to social groups, whether ingroups or outgroups.”
Emotion in inter-group relations (2008, background): “Other work argues that a minimal level of identification with an in-group (i.e., the individual’s psychological connection to an in-group) is necessary for individuals to experience emotion about the in-group and its relation to out-groups (e.g., Mackie et al., 2004; E. R. Smith et al., 2007).”
Politics, schadenfreude, and ingroup identification: The sometimes happy thing about a poor economy and death (2009, background): “In each of the studies, we expected that party affiliation and level of party identification (Mackie et al., 2004), would predict the amount of schadenfreude felt by participants.”
How Perspective-Taking Helps and Hinders Group-Based Guilt as a Function of Group Identification (2009, background): “In fact, intergroup emotion theory (IET: see Mackie et al., 2004; Smith, 1993) postulates that generally, group-based emotions intensify to the extent that group members are more identifi ed with their group.”
Group-level self-definition and self-investment: a hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. (2008, background): “For example, most recent research on group-based emotion presumes that individuals’ identification with an in-group is a necessary precondition (Mackie et al., 2004; Smith, 1993).”
The MAD Model of Moral Contagion: The Role of Motivation, Attention, and Design in the Spread of Moralized Content Online (2019, background): “The central insight of intergroup emotions theory (Mackie, Silver, & Smith, 2004) is that when group identities are salient people begin to experience and express emotions on the basis of elicitors that are relevant to the group.”