The Cambridge Guide to Second Language Assessment

By C. Coombe, P. Davidson, B. O’Sullivan, Stephen Stoynoff. 2012

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e893c9d2e87d06e12efc4ff8442889333d66ddcc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Shidur Rahman
2. Kari Vogt
3. Dina Tsagari
4. H. Mohajan
5. B. Kremmel

Citations in the corpus

• Assessment Literacy of Foreign Language Teachers: Findings of a European Study (2014, background): “(p. 125) However, while teachers’ LTA practice has taken on a new importance in educational systems on a global scale (see Coombe, Troudi, & Al-Hamly, 2012; Gardner, 2010; Stoynoff & Coombe, 2012; Turner, 2012), their LTA competency has been seriously questioned.”
• The Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Methods in Language “Testing and Assessment” Research: A Literature Review (2016, background): “It is noted that the psychometric-structural phase of language testing denoted by Spolsky emphasised on test reliability and established the concept of language testing as measurement (Morrow, 2012).”