A SMALL STUDY OF TRAINING IN MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING: DOES ONE WORKSHOP CHANGE CLINICIAN AND CLIENT BEHAVIOR?
By W. Miller, Kathy Mount. 2001
535 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e8648a4a91e7e0acde171e733851dcdcfba03188
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- T. Moyers
- R. Beidas
- P. Kendall
- S. Rollnick
- G. Rose
- Alexander M. Holsinger
- Christopher T. Lowenkamp
- R. K. Martins
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Eight Stages in Learning Motivational Interviewing (2006, unknown): “Miller and Mount (2001) found that a familiar method of continuing professional education–a 2-day clinical workshop–did not significantly increase counselors’ proficiency in MI. Comparing audiotaped samples of trainees’ counseling sessions before and after training, they observed some statistically…”
- A random study of Staff Training Aimed at Reducing Re-arrest (STARR): using core correctional practices in probation interactions (2012, background): “Several studies have revealed the utility of tape review (both audio and video) when determining the effectiveness of various training and/or technology transfer strategies (Miller and Mount 2001 , Baer et al .”
- The Role of Therapist Training in the Implementation of Psychosocial Treatments: A Review and Critique with Recommendations (2010, methodology): “Other studies, using more stringent assessment methods, behavior observation (Miller & Mount, 2001) and chart review (Jensen-Doss, Cusack, & de Arellano, 2007), found that training did not impact patient response or provider behavior, respectively.”
- Motivational interviewing with offenders: A systematic review (2009, background): “Miller and Mount (2001) found that professionals trained in MI showed their learning well on paper-and-pencil tests, but observations of their practice in the clinical setting did not show them to be as proficient as they claimed.”
- Review of Motivational Interviewing in promoting health behaviors. (2009, background): “Although increases in MI proficiency often were noted after training workshops (e.g., Miller, Yahne, Moyers, Martinez, & Pirritano, 2004), a tendency to return to baseline over time, with no additional training, feedback, or coaching, has been observed (Miller & Mount, 2001).”
- Assessing competence in the use of motivational interviewing. (2005, methodology): “For example, Miller and Mount (2001) used the MISC to code both pre- and post-training sessions for probation and parole officers enrolled in an MI workshop.”
- Ten things that motivational interviewing is not. (2009, background): “Adherence to the spirit of MI is reliably measurable, and predicts treatment outcome (Gaume, Gmel and Daeppen, 2008; Madsón and Campbell, 2006; Miller and Mount, 2001; Moyers, Martin, Catley, Harris and Ahluwalia, 2003; Moyers, Martin, Houck, Christopher and Tonigan, in press).”
- A randomized trial of methods to help clinicians learn motivational interviewing. (2004, methodology): “Role-played interviews with actors, however, do not fully represent natural practice (Miller & Mount, 2001), and we therefore regarded the 4-month clinical practice sample as providing the best test of proximal skill utilization relative to baseline.”
- Toward a Theory of Motivational Interviewing (2009, methodology): “In short, the workshop convinced clinicians that they had acquired MI skillfulness, but their actual practice did not change enough to make any difference to their clients (Miller & Mount, 2001).”
- Training Therapists in Evidence-Based Practice: A Critical Review of Studies From a Systems-Contextual Perspective (2010, methodology): “The mismatch in perception and actual behavior is highly problematic and has important implications because clinicians may believe they are implementing a treatment with fidelity and skill (Miller & Mount, 2001).”