Modeling Outcomes With Floor or Ceiling Effects: An Introduction to the Tobit Model

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Analyzing Skewed Continuous Outcomes With Many Zeros: A Tutorial for Social Work and Youth Prevention Science Researchers (2018, methodology): “As a result, pseudo-R2 measures are reported instead (McBee, 2010).”
Modeling disease progression via multi-task learning (2013, unknown): “…of the Tobit model have been well studied (Amemiya, 1973, 2010) and the Tobit model has also been used widely in many areas including economics, statistics, and bioinformatics (Epstein et al., 2003; Frone et al., 1994; McBee, 2010; McDonald and Moffitt, 1980; Ravona-Springer et al., 2012).”
Research on Giftedness and Gifted Education (2014, methodology): “Existing standardized instruments suffer from two serious limitations for use in experimental studies: insufficient validity for this purpose because of the mismatch between the level and complexity (and sometimes topical content) of curriculum offered to gifted students and ceiling effects (Callaha”
Unpredictable animals: individual differences in intraindividual variability (IIV) (2012, methodology): “Although some authors have devised statistical methods to ‘correct’ censored data after the fact, these methods are based on underlying assumptions about the distributions of the variables of interest (Wang et al. 2009; McBee 2010).”