Wicked Problems and Network Approaches to Resolution

By N. Roberts. 2000

584 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e8489af49f57c3da33c0cf2dc8a6c71412c48a36

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. D. Dentoni
2. B. Crosby
3. V. Bitzer
4. J. Bryson
5. G. Schouten
6. J. Torfing
7. Art Dewulf
8. C. Termeer

Citations in the corpus

• Metagoverning Collaborative Innovation in Governance Networks (2017, background): “Western liberal governments have become increasingly interested in promoting public innovation in response to fiscal constraints (Pollitt, 2010), the proliferation of wicked and unruly problems (Koppenjan & Klijn, 2004; Roberts, 2000), the citizens’ growing distrust of democratically elected governm”
• A leadership framework for cross-sector collaboration (2005, background): “As Nancy Roberts (2000) has argued, policy change advocates often have to fail their way into collaboration.”
• Governance of Wicked Climate Adaptation Problems (2012, methodology): “Theories like collaborative governance (Gray 1989; Huxham 2000) and network governance (Klijn and Koppenjan 2000; Van Bueren et al. 2003; Roberts 2000) explicitly pay attention to the diversity of perspectives, and both aim to provide strategies to find workable techniques for taking these multiple ”
• Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings (2008, unknown): “…and practitioners from diff erent disciplines recognized that the dynamic complexity of many public problems defi es the confi nes of established “stovepiped” systems of problem defi nition, administration, and resolution ( Churchman 1967; Rittel and Webber 1973; Roberts 1997, 2000, 2002b ).”
• Harnessing Wicked Problems in Multi-stakeholder Partnerships (2018, background): “…focused in particular on the intractable and dynamic nature of wicked problems (Batie 2008), the social construction of problem definitions and perceptions (Roberts 2000; Weber and Khademian 2008), and the futility of attempts to solve wicked problems (Conklin 2006; Jentoft and Chuenpagdee 2009).”
• Using Framework Analysis in Applied Qualitative Research (2021, unknown): “Data types used in framework analysis have included in-depth individual interviews, focus groups, observational data, policy documents, online discussion board posts, photographs, and case studies (Johnston et al., 2014; Mason et al., 2018; Ritchie & Spencer, 1994; Roberts, 2000; Robertshaw & Cross,”