Aspects of goal networks: Implications for self-regulation.

By James Y. Shah, Arie W. Kruglanski. 2000

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e8296009109b9b580a3ab6ae1f592497c0960356

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The role of music in adolescents' mood regulation (2007, background): “Shah and Kruglanski (2000) argue that individuals often choose means that simultaneously attain the satisfaction of as many goals as possible.”
An Achievement Goal Theory Perspective on Issues in Motivation Terminology, Theory, and Research. (2000, background): “Under this type of model, goals might be conceptualized as part of a network of connections between different aspects of goals as well as the strategies or means to accomplish them (Shah and Kruglanski, 2000).”
Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning Constructs (2004, unknown): “…Schunk & Ertmer, 2000; Shah & Kruglanski, 2000; Zimmerman, 1995a, 1995b, 2000), intrinsic goal orientation (Pintrich, 2000), extrinsic goal orientation (Pintrich et al., 1991), goal variables (Shah & Kruglanski, 2000; Zimmerman, 2000), and a possible-selves framework (Pintrich & Garcia, 1994).”
Getting to the “COR” (2014, background): “As a result, more than one resource can compete to achieve a common goal (termed equifinality; Kruglanski, 1996; Shah & Kruglanski, 2000).”
A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts. (2003, background): “…theme, and as Anderman (1999) has suggested, motivation research in this area could be informed by social psychological perspectives (e.g., Shah & Kruglanski, 2000) that suggest that goals can be attained through different means (the principle of equifinality), such that some goals can be…”
Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. (2002, background): “The principle of equifinality posits that the same goals can be achieved in multiple ways or by different actions (Ford, 1992; Pintrich, 2000c; Shah & Kruglanski, 2000).”
Effecting Durable Change (2004, background): “Shah and Kruglanski (2000) describe how the mental representations of goal-action links may be attenuated when several goals are served by the same action.”
A motivated action theory account of goal orientation. (2005, background): “We then discuss research implications of MAT that have not been addressed in the goal orientation literature.”
Task Value, Self-Efficacy and Goal Orientations: Impact on self-regulated learning, choice and performance among university students (2007, background): “…recognise that students can endorse both learning and performance goals with different levels of these two goals (Bouffard, Boisvert, Vezeau, & Larouche, 1995; Dupeyrat & Mariné, 2001; McWhaw & Abrami, 2001; Pintrich, 2000; Riveiro, Cabanach, & Arias, 2001; Shah & Kruglanski, 2000; Wentzel, 2000).”
Can boredom help? Increased prosocial intentions in response to boredom (2017, unknown): “In other words, people who strive for meaning are more attuned to actions that facilitate their goal-pursuit (e.g., see Heckhausen & Heckhausen, 2008: see also Kruglanski, Shah, Fishbach, Friedman, Chun, & Sleeth-Keppler, 2002; Shah & Kruglanski, 2000, 2003).”
The Automatic Pursuit and Management of Goals (2005, background): “Indeed, a goal may be less likely to be primed by a means that also serves other goals than by a means that serves only that goal (Shah & Kruglanski, 2000).”