Correlation between electronic nose signals and fruit quality indicators on shelf-life measurements with pinklady apples

By J. Brezmes, Eduard Llobet, X. Vilanova, J. Orts, G. Saiz, X. Correig. 2001

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Analytical Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e7fdd97efd018dd1d9e0ccdc585d2bbc8b8afbcf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Analytical Chemistry

1. Jun Wang
2. Alphus D. Wilson
3. Amalia Berna
4. Manuela Baietto
5. Y. B. Che Man

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Jun Wang
2. Alphus D. Wilson
3. Amalia Berna
4. Manuela Baietto
5. Y. B. Che Man

Citations in the corpus

• Evaluation of tomato maturity by electronic nose (2006, background): “…et al., 1996), pears (Oshita et al., 2000; Correa et al., 2001), peaches (Molto et al., 1999; Brezmes et al., 2000; Di Natale et al., 2001b), bananas (Llobet et al., 1999), apples (Hines et al., 1999; Brezmes et al., 2000, 2001; Saevels et al., 2003), and nectarines (Di Natale et al., 2001b).”
• Discrimination of storage shelf-life for mandarin by electronic nose technique (2007, methodology): “…(Berna, Jeroen, Stijn, Corrado, & Nicolaı̈, 2004), apples (Young, Rossiter, Wang, & Miller, 1999; Brezmes, Llobet, Vilanova, Saiz, & Correig, 2000; Brezmes et al., 2001; Saevels et al., 2003) and cherry (Toivonen, Kappel, Stan, McKenzie, & Hocking, 2006), but as yet few literatures refer to…”