Demography of source—sink populations and the evolution of ecological niches

By Tadeusz J. Kawecki. Evolutionary Ecology, 2005

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e679a31a0bce733547ed9ae105a39f75089e94a9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

INTERPRETATION OF MODELS OF FUNDAMENTAL ECOLOGICAL NICHES AND SPECIES' DISTRIBUTIONAL AREAS (2005, background): “In theory (Holt 1996a, b; Holt & Gaines 1992; Holt & Gomulkiewicz 1996; Kawecki 1995), and in the limited experiments carried out to date (Etterson & Shaw 2001), effects of evolution in niche parameters over short periods of time appear minor.”
Uses and requirements of ecological niche models and related distributional models (2006, background): “Recent theoretical treatments suggest that such should be the case—that, under many circumstances, ecological niche characteristics should not prove particularly labile in their evolution (Brown and Pavlovic 1992; Holt 1996; Holt and Gaines 1992; Holt and Gomulkiewicz 1996; Kawecki 1995).”
Conceptual issues in local adaptation (2004, background): “At such an equilibrium the population has a source-sink structure, characterized by asymmetric gene flow (Holt & Gaines 1992; Dias 1996), which makes it difficult for alleles improving adaptation in a sink habitat to spread (Holt & Gaines 1992; Kawecki 1995; Holt 1996).”
Theoretical models of species' borders: single species approaches (2005, unknown): “Species could also switch from an equilibrial to non-equilibrial range limit as a consequence of evolutionary processes (e.g. adaptive evolution in sink habitats at range margins; Holt and Gaines 1992, Kawecki 1995, Gomulkiewicz et al. 1999, Wiens 2004).”
On the evolutionary ecology of species' ranges (2003, background): “The theoretical studies cited above show that in many (but not all) circumstances, the force of selection may be weak for fostering adaptation to sink environments, particularly if dispersal rates are low, absolute fitness in the sink is initially low and density dependence is strong ( Kawecki, 1995”
Demographic constraints in evolution: Towards unifying the evolutionary theories of senescence and niche conservatism (2005, methodology): “ Kawecki, 1995 ) are examples of stage-structured population models (Caswell, 1989), in which 'stage' can be identified with the occupancy of a particular habitat patch.”
Ecological niches as stable distributional constraints on mammal species, with implications for Pleistocene extinctions and climate change projections for biodiversity (2004, background): “Recent theoretical work (Bradshaw, 1991; Brown & Pavlovic, 1992; Kawecki & Stearns, 1993; Kawecki, 1995; Holt & Gomulkiewicz, 1996; Holt, 1996) and empirical comparisons of niche characteristics between sister species (Huntley et al .”
Niche differentiation in Mexican birds: using point occurrences to detect ecological innovation (2003, background): “Theoretical studies of evolution in heterogeneous environments (Holt & Gaines 1992; Kawecki 1995, 2000; Holt 1996, 2003; Holt & Gomulkiewicz 1997; Kirkpatrick & Barton 1997; Tufto 2001; Kawecki & Holt 2002; Proulx 2002) provide a framework for understanding how niche conservatism can reflect the i”
The multifarious effects of dispersal and gene flow on contemporary adaptation (2007, background): “Dispersal from sources can sometimes maintain these sinks long enough that they can eventually adapt and themselves become sources (Kawecki 1995; Holt & Gomulkiewicz 1997).”
Local adaptation to serpentine and non-serpentine soils in Collinsia sparsiflora (2006, background): “© 2006 Jessica Wilcox Wright Kawecki, 1995), the extent to which important phenotypic variation is heritable (van Tienderen, 1992), and levels of gene flow between populations due to dispersal and immigration (Holt, 1996; García-Ramos and Kirkpatrick, 1997; Holt and Gomulkiewicz, 1997; Kirkpatrick a”
Evolutionary Consequences of Fallback Foods (2007, background): “…probably acts relatively intensely on traits that confer a survival advantage on individuals that possess them (Boag and Grant 1981), producing phenotypic adaptations for processing nonpreferred FBFs that are crucial for survival during these periods (Kawecki 1995; Robinson and Wilson 1998).”