Theoretical models of species' borders: single species approaches

By Robert D. Holt, Timothy H. Keitt, Mark A. Lewis, Brian A. Maurer, Mark L. Taper. 2005

316 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d002f913bde160b1e09845b2a2cdc6b9968e46c4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

How climate extremes—not means—define a species' geographic range boundary via a demographic tipping point (2014, background): “Holt et al. (2005) proposed a small set of demographic mechanisms related to spatial variation in populationdynamic parameters (e.g., birth, death, and dispersal rates) that may collectively determine a species’ range boundaries under many conditions.”
Tools for integrating range change, extinction risk and climate change information into conservation management (2013, background): “To meet global and regional biodiversity conservation targets (Butchart et al. 2010), we need an improved understanding of the mechanistic underpinnings of range limits (Holt et al. 2005, Sexton et al. 2009) and model architectures to extend this new found knowledge (Schurr et al. 2012).”
Accounting for uncertainty when mapping species distributions: The need for maps of ignorance (2011, background): “…by its intrinsic population dynamics, environmental adaptations and/or dispersal capacity, as well as by landscape and environmental complexity (Chust et al., 2003; Holt et al., 2005; Nagendra, 2001; Ricotta and Anand, 2006; Rocchini and Ricotta, 2007; Soberón, 2007, 2010; Whittaker et al., 2001).”
Genetic variation across species’ geographical ranges: the central–marginal hypothesis and beyond (2008, background): “It is also an issue that bears on one of the most enduring and poorly resolved problems in evolutionary biology (Hoffmann & Parsons 1997; Gaston 2003; Holt et al. 2005; Bridle & Vines 2007): why do species exhibit evolutionarily stable limits to their geographical distributions?”
Impacts of habitat loss and restoration on amphibian populations (2009, background): “First, while ‘habitat availability’ is known to limit species’ ranges (Holt et al. 2005), study II illustrated that ‘habitat’ may differ across the range because of physiological constraints.”
A quantitative synthesis of the importance of variables used in MaxEnt species distribution models (2017, background): “…is thus a spatial expression of its niche, although other factors such as disper- sal limitation and biotic interactions can affect true distribu- tions (Holt et al., 2005); these factors distinguish between the realized niche (area where species exists) and fundamen- tal niche (area wherein…”
The effects of phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation on forecasts of species range shifts under climate change. (2014, background): “Populations at range limits are structured in metapopulations, constituting a shifting mosaic of source and sink populations held together by migration (Holt et al. 2005).”
Extinction debt and colonization credit delay range shifts of eastern North American trees (2017, unknown): “Although theoretical studies have shown how colonization–extinction dynamics can lead to range limits 20,21 , this is, to our knowledge, the first time the theory is applied to explain species distributions.”
Biogeographical variation in the population density of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in western Eurasia (2006, background): “Implications of large-scale patterns in abundance of wild boar Species borders, as stated by Holt et al. (2005), are a geographical manifestation of species demographic responses to a spatially and temporally varying world.”