The multifarious effects of dispersal and gene flow on contemporary adaptation

By D. Garant, S. Forde, A. Hendry. 2007

578 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/39d26c4e9187d7515a2596f6af9e908fb62b6d13

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Isolation by environment (2014, background): “If hybrid offspring have intermediate phenotypes, then they may not occupy an available ecological niche in their natal environment or may have limited mating opportunities, both of which will reduce effective rates of long-term gene flow (Nosil et al. 2005; Garant et al. 2007; McBride & Singer 2010”
Keeping up with a warming world; assessing the rate of adaptation to climate change (2008, background): “These animals may have genotypes that are better adapted to warmer conditions and hence dispersal may lead to more genetic variation, and hence speed up adaptation rate (Garant et al. 2007).”
Paradigm shifts in marine fisheries genetics: ugly hypotheses slain by beautiful facts (2008, background): “Interestingly, the negative relationship between gene flow and adaptation may further increase the imbalance in productivity between populations (Garant et al. 2007) – high migration rates from a source to a sink population may cause a large influx of maladapted migrants into the sink, thus reducing”
Climatic control of dispersal–ecological specialization trade‐offs: a metacommunity process at the heart of the latitudinal diversity gradient? (2010, background): “When populations are not easily isolated, adaptive divergence and ultimately speciation rates tend to be relatively low (Garant et al., 2007).”
Bringing the Hutchinsonian niche into the 21st century: Ecological and evolutionary perspectives (2009, background): “Theoretical studies have clarified the manifold effects of movement on the likelihood of niche evolution (73, 76, 77).”
Underappreciated Consequences of Phenotypic Plasticity for Ecological Speciation (2012, background): “When there is gene flow between populations, the effect of divergent selection depends on the relative magnitudes of selection and gene flow [1, 69–73], in addition to demographic factors [74–76].”
Evolution on ecological time‐scales (2007, background): “Garant, Ford & Hendry (2007) highlight the important differences between traits adapting to relatively static environmental conditions versus those caught up in co-evolutionary dynamics, with the latter likely benefiting more from the genetic variation brought by gene flow.”
Eco-evolutionary dynamics (2016, background): “One factor that can influence genetic variation, adaptation and population dynamics is dispersal (reviewed in Garant et al. 2007).”
Climate change, adaptation, and phenotypic plasticity: the problem and the evidence (2014, background): “In the present special issue, papers paying particular attention to experimental manipulations include Franks et al. (2014), Collins et al. (2014), and Urban et al. (2014).”
Biodiversity and Climate Change: Integrating Evolutionary and Ecological Responses of Species and Communities (2010, background): “Yet, interactions between dispersal and adaptation are more complex than apparent in that simple alternative (Garant et al. 2007).”
Mammalian Response to Cenozoic Climatic Change (2009, background): “Over time these population processes, combined with the addition of genetic novelty, affect the prevalence of genes with adaptive potential for novel climates, which also is fodder for heritable changes within lineages (Garant et al. 2007).”
Contemporary evolution of secondary sexual traits in the wild (2007, background): “Comparisons between closely related populations will thus be more informative in this context, compared with comparative studies of populations that are widely geographically separated (Badyaev et al . 2000), and where selection can operate more-or-less unopposed by gene flow ( Garant et al . 2007 )”