Conceptual issues in local adaptation

By Tadeusz J. Kawecki, D. Ebert. 2004

3,702 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/80d7f8d66958b842f8751a5726b9b805f85e6949

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Genetics

Citations in the corpus

Adaptation, Genetic Drift, Pleiotropy, and History in the Evolution of Bee Foraging Behavior (2006, methodology): “Reciprocal transplant experiments are a useful tool to examine hypotheses of local adaptation (Kawecki and Ebert, 2004), and the comparative phylogenetic method (Harvey and Purvis, 1991) allows us to identify patterns of adaptation by comparing closely related species.”
The Role of Parasitism in Adaptive Radiations—When Might Parasites Promote and When Might They Constrain Ecological Speciation? (2012, background): “On the other hand, when parasites adapt to their local host population (reviews in [113–115]), gene flow into the host population from outside could be adaptive because it would provide genetic variants not known to the local parasites that escape parasitism.”
The effects of phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation on forecasts of species range shifts under climate change. (2014, background): “Since then, numerous examples of such within-species differentiation have been published and attention has more recently turned to the question of under what circumstances local adaptation is likely to evolve (Kawecki & Ebert 2004; Savolainen et al. 2007; Leimu & Fischer 2008; Ara ujo et al. 2013).”
Where am I and why? Synthesizing range biology and the eco-evolutionary dynamics of dispersal (2014, background): “Evidently, choosing one’s habitat improves the match between phenotype and environment and thus increases local adaptation of populations and reduces extinction risk (Kawecki and Ebert 2004).”
Soils as agents of selection: feedbacks between plants and soils alter seedling survival and performance (2010, result): “fremontii each outperform the other on their respective local soils (Kawecki and Ebert 2004), the results of the study are in line with local adaptation of P.”
Melanin-based colorations signal strategies to cope with poor and rich environments (2008, background): “if the relative rank ordering of fitness of different individuals changes across environments (Levene 1953; Gillespie and Turelli 1989; Kassen 2002; Kawecki and Ebert 2004; Spichtig and Kawecki 2004; Byers 2005; but see Prout and Savolainen 1996).”
An inventory of invasive alien species in China (2012, background): “Such experiments will allow to distinguish if differences between ranges are caused by phenotypic responses towards different environmental conditions or by genetic changes (Leger and Rice 2003, Kawecki and Ebert 2004, Erfmeier and Bruelheide 2005, van Kleunen et al. 2010).”
Genetic differentiation and plasticity interact along temperature and precipitation gradients to determine plant performance under climate change (2017, methodology): “Previous studies specifically exploring local adaptation of species (sensu Kawecki & Ebert 2004) in relation to climate mainly assessed adaptation to temperature (Williams & Black 1993; Mimura & Aitken 2010; De Frenne et al. 2011; Souther, Lechowicz & McGraw 2012) and demonstrate that temperature…”
The multifarious effects of dispersal and gene flow on contemporary adaptation (2007, background): “Holt & Gomulkiewicz 1997; Case & Taper 2000; Kawecki & Ebert 2004; Holt et al . 2005; Alleaume-Benharira et al . 2006).”
Isolation by environment (2014, background): “In these cases, populations evolve traits suited to their local environments, regardless of their fitness consequences in other environments (Kawecki & Ebert 2004; Servedio 2004; Nosil et al. 2005).”
Adaptation and the physiology of ocean acidification (2013, positive): “…handful of species, we also know that patterns of environmental variability are key to maintaining intraspecific variation in the form of local adaptation, where local genotypes have higher fitness in their home environment relative to foreign genotypes (Kawecki & Ebert 2004; Sanford & Kelly 2010).”
Environment‐enhanced self‐fertilization: implications for niche shifts in adjacent populations (2010, background): “…from core populations to ecologically marginal populations may counter the effect of divergent selection on the latter, thus thwarting their ability to adapt to novel habitats (Kirkpatrick & Barton 1997; Lenormand 2002; Kawecki & Ebert 2004; Alleume-Benharira, Pen&Ronce 2006; Bridle & Vines 2006).”
Ecological genomics meets community-level modelling of biodiversity: mapping the genomic landscape of current and future environmental adaptation. (2015, background): “…of climate responses below the species level, in reality local adaptation of different populations is common among many plants and animals (Kawecki & Ebert 2004; Savolainen et al. 2007; Leimu & Fischer 2008), and intraspecific variation in climatic tolerances and local adaptation has been…”
Identifying targets and agents of selection: innovative methods to evaluate the processes that contribute to local adaptation (2017, background): “These studies demonstrate the prevalence of local adaptation to contrasting environments, whereby local genotypes outperform foreign transplants (i.e. ‘reciprocal home site advantage’, Kawecki & Ebert 2004).”
Local adaptation and plasticity of Erysimum capitatum to altitude: its implications for responses to climate change (2013, background): “Reciprocal transplants between contrasting habitats are powerful tools for detecting local adaptation and phenotypic plasticity (Claussen, Keck & Hiesey 1940; Reznick & Travis 1996; Kawecki & Ebert 2004).”
Climate change, adaptation, and phenotypic plasticity: the problem and the evidence (2014, methodology): “If responses to climate change could be assessed synchronically, the present paper would be unnecessary because the various methods have been much discussed and evaluated (e.g., Endler 1986; Kawecki and Ebert 2004; Blanquart et al. 2013).”
Ecological rather than geographic or genetic distance affects local adaptation of the rare perennial herb, Aster amellus (2007, background): “Plants are considered locally adapted when local plants show higher fitness than foreign plants within each site (Kawecki and Ebert, 2004).”
The genomics of local adaptation in trees: are we out of the woods yet? (2017, background): “If a population is locally adapted, individuals exposed to their native environments should show increased growth, survival, and reproduction relative to non-native genotypes (Kawecki & Ebert 2004; Leimu & Fischer 2008; Hereford 2009; Savolainen et al. 2013).”
PART OF A SPECIAL ISSUE ON POLLINATOR-DRIVEN SPECIATION Pollinator shifts and the evolution of spur length in the moth-pollinated orchid Platanthera bifolia (2014, background): “…experiments provide a critical test of the hypothesis that populations have adapted to local environmental conditions (Clausen et al., 1940; Kawecki and Ebert, 2004; Ågren and Schemske, 2012), and have demonstrated adaptive differentiation among populations of a large number of both plant…”