Mission Drift in Qualitative Research, or Moving Toward a Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies, Moving Back to a More Systematic Narrative Review.

By K. Jones. 2004

194 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A systematic literature review of the influence of the university’s environment and support system on the precursors of social entrepreneurial intention of students (2020, background): “Table 2 provides the preliminary synthesis of results across studies (Forbes & Griffiths, 2002; Fulop, 2001; Jensen & Allen, 1996; Jones, 2004). Due to space limitation, Table 2 shows only the hypotheses formulated by the different researchers who used SEI models based on theory, and stated whether ”
A Compilation of Strategies for Implementing Clinical Innovations in Health and Mental Health (2011, background): “(Hammersley, 2002), and are effective in capturing diversities and pluralities of understanding (Jones, 2004).”
Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks (2015, background): “Narrative reviews yield qualitative results, with strengths in capturing diversities and pluralities of understanding [18,19].”