Resisting medicines: a synthesis of qualitative studies of medicine taking.
By P. Pound, N. Britten, M. Morgan, Lucy Yardley, Catherine Pope, G. Daker-White, R. Campbell. Social Science & Medicine (1967), 2005
925 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Philosophy
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/96479d61081b5a56cefceaf3429dab69726d2713
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Philosophy
Citations in the corpus
- Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. (2007, neutral): “Formal reporting guidelines have been developed for randomized controlled trials (CONSORT) [1], diagnostic test studies (STARD), meta-analysis of RCTs (QUOROM) [2], observational studies (STROBE) [3] and meta-analyses of observational studies (MOOSE) [ 4 ].”
- Justifying Knowledge, Justifying Method, Taking Action: Epistemologies, Methodologies, and Methods in Qualitative Research (2007, background): “The assessment and synthesis of such research, especially in health, is an increasingly pressing issue (Cochrane Qualitative Research Methods Group, 2006; Pound et al., 2005), as reflected in discussions at qualitative research conferences in 2006, including the International Institute for Qualitati”
- Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ (2012, background): “Syntheses of qualitative research can pull together data across different contexts, generate new theoretical or conceptual models, identify research gaps, inform the development of primary studies, and provide evidence for the development, implementation and evaluation of health interventions [2-9].”