A decade of CASP: progress, bottlenecks and prognosis in protein structure prediction.

By John Moult. 2005

493 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Materials Chemistry

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

lDDT: a local superposition-free score for comparing protein structures and models using distance difference tests (2013, methodology): “To fill this gap, various computational approaches have been developed to predict a protein’s structure starting from its amino-acid sequence (Guex et al ., 2009; Moult, 2005; Schwede et al ., 2009).”
Protein 3D Structure Computed from Evolutionary Sequence Variation (2011, methodology): “Progress in this field has been expertly assessed by the pioneering community effort, the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP), founded by Krzysztof Fidelis, John Moult and their colleagues in 1994 [69,70,71], www.”
The SWISS-MODEL Repository: new features and functionalities (2005, methodology): “The accuracy and reliability of different structure prediction approaches have been assessed in several rounds of CASP (Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction) experiments ( 5 ).”
Automated server predictions in CASP7 (2007, background): “7 In contrast, for the 123 target domains in CASP7, the best model (or tied with humans) was submitted by a server in 29% of the cases.”
Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using Modeller (2006, methodology): “Improving the performance and accuracy of methods in this regime remains one of the main tasks of comparative modeling today (Moult, 2005).”
Why similar protein sequences encode similar three-dimensional structures? (2010, background): “This classical observation of Chothia and Lesk was later confirmed many times (e.g., in the CASP experiments [ 6 ]).”
Exploring the extremes of sequence/structure space with ensemble fold recognition in the program Phyre (2008, background): “The 10 FR-systems used in the Phyre ensemble are methods 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 21, 22, 25, and 31.”
The protein folding problem. (2008, background): “Over the seven CASPs, two trends are clear (164, 219).”
CASP13 Target Classification into Tertiary Structure Prediction Categories (2019, methodology): “The Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP) aims to assess the current state of the art in protein structure modeling methods.(1,2)”
3D Protein Structure Predicted from Sequence (2011, unknown): “Progress in this field has been expertly assessed by the pioneering community effort, the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP), founded by Krzysztof Fidelis, John Mou”
The Protein Structure Initiative: achievements and visions for the future (2012, methodology): “…that can be used for testing new methods for protein structure prediction and automated data analysis, including data used in such projects as the Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction [19,20] and the Critical Assessment of Automated Structure Determination of Proteins from NMR data [21].”
Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER (2016, methodology): “Improving the performance and accuracy of methods in this regime remains one of the main tasks of comparative modeling today (Moult, 2005).”