SPECIAL ISSUE: The Dynamics and Value of Ecosystem Services: Integrating Economic and Ecological Perspectives Modeling the dynamics of the integrated earth system and the value of global ecosystem…

By Roelof Boumans, Robert Costanza, J. Farley, M. Wilson, R. Portela, Jan Rotmans, F. Villa, M. Grasso. 2002

333 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e51927d3ec4d2d15a53ef8a7505ed293e7c4bec3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

In Global and Planetary Change

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

SPECIAL ISSUE: The Dynamics and Value of Ecosystem Services: Integrating Economic and Ecological Perspectives Global estimates of market and non-market values derived from nighttime satellite imagery, land cover, and ecosystem service valuation (2002, background): “Sustainability P.C. Sutton, R. Costanza / Ecological Economics 41 (2002) 509–527512 is much more difficult to assess and requires (at minimum) a dynamic modeling approach to even begin to frame the appropriate questions (c.f. Boumans et al., 2002).”
Research, part of a Special Feature on A Framework for Analyzing, Comparing, and Diagnosing Social-Ecological Systems Comparison of Frameworks for Analyzing Social-ecological Systems (2013, methodology): “Schellnhuber 1998, 1999, Schellnhuber et al. 2005 Ecosystem Services (ES) Analyze the integral, dynamic, and complex interactions of biotic and abiotic components of an ecosystem in relation to the supply of services this system provides to support life on Earth. risks and opportunities associated w”
Ecosystem health and ecological engineering (2012, methodology): “Such a methodology, although seful as an initial estimate, is just a first cut and much progress as been made since then (cf. Boumans et al., 2002; USEPA Science ense.”
Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection (2004, methodology): “Previous analyses were limited to only a subset of the world’s biomes (e.g. White et al. 2000, FAO 2003), and often focused on habitat loss and protection separately (e.g. compare Hannah et al. 1995 and Chape et al. 2003), thus obscuring a broader perspective on the magnitude of the biome crisis.”
The future value of ecosystem services: global scenarios and national implications (2017, methodology): “…number of site-speciﬁc estimates, constant unit values per hectare per biome, not considering dynamic interdependencies, etc.) most likely lead to underestimates of the true value of ecosystem services (Boumans et al., 2002; Costanza et al., 2014), so we consider our estimates to be conservative.”
Landscapes' Capacities to Provide Ecosystem Services - a Concept for Land-Cover Based Assessments (2009, methodology): “…the MIMES approach (Multiscale Integrated Model of the Earth Systems’ Ecological Services, www.uvm.edu/giee/mimes) which builds on the GUMBO model (Boumans et al. 2002) and aims at evaluating the effects of land use changes on ecosystem services on various scales by integrating participatory…”
Modelling and measuring sustainable wellbeing in connection with the UN Sustainable Development Goals (2016, background): “Versions of such models exist (Boumans et al., 2002; Costanza et al., 2007) and are currently in further development.”
Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? (2017, methodology): “Another key challenge is accurately measuring the functioning of the system to correctly quantify the amount of a given service derived from that system (Boumans et al., 2002; Barbier et al., 2008; Koch et al., 2009).”
SPECIAL ISSUE: The Dynamics and Value of Ecosystem Services: Integrating Economic and Ecological Perspectives Evaluating scale dependence of ecosystem service valuation: a comparison of NOAA-AVHRR and Landsat TM datasets (2002, background): “namics of ecosystem services by coupling the dynamics of the physical earth to anthropogenic behavior (Boumans et al., 2002).”
Building a Sustainable and Desirable Economy-in-Society-in-Nature (2013, methodology): “These include studies using such well-established models as World3, the subject of The Limits to Growth (Meadows et al. 1972) and other more recent books, and the Global Unifi ed Metamodel of the BiOsphere (GUMBO) (Boumans et al. 2002).”
Integrated environmental modeling: A vision and roadmap for the future (2013, methodology): “Other methods, based upon speci ﬁ c quantitative modeling approaches, include systems dynamics (Boumans et al., 2002; Fenner et al., 2005; Muetzelfeldt and Masheder, 2003), fuzzy cognitive mapping (Özesmi and Özesmi, 2004; Samarasinghe and Strickert, in this issue), and Bayesian inference (Reckhow,…”
Valuing natural capital and ecosystem services toward the goals of efficiency, fairness, and sustainability (2020, positive): “S-Valuation requires an integrated, whole system approach at the appropriate spatial and temporal scales (Boumans et al., 2002; Costanza et al., 2002, Costanza and Voinov, 2003; Braat et al., 2014).”
A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services (2002, background): “Since most functions and related ecosystem processes are inter-linked, sustainable use levels should be determined under complex system conditions (see Limburg et al., 2002), taking due account of the dynamic interactions between functions, values and processes (Boumans et al., 2002).”