Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection
By J. Hoekstra, T. Boucher, Taylor H. Ricketts, C. S. Roberts. 2004
1,809 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/70e3bb697dc7face198c01857f6271dd38bbfaf0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
- Jorge M. Lobo
- Miguel B. Araújo
- Wilfried Thuiller
- H. Kreft
- Risto Heikkinen
- A. Jiménez‐Valverde
- Walter Jetz
- Antoine Guisan
In Global and Planetary Change
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- T. Tscharntke
- N. Williams
- C. Kremen
- Jorge M. Lobo
- I. Steffan‐Dewenter
- R. Winfree
- Alexandra-Maria Klein
- Wilfried Thuiller
Citations in the corpus
- A multi-scaled analysis of avian response to habitat amount and fragmentation in the Canadian dry mixed-grass prairie (2006, background): “Temperate grasslands have undergone some of the highest rates of habitat conversion of any biome world-wide, while being afforded the least protection (Hoekstra et al. 2005).”
- A global assessment of endemism and species richness across island and mainland regions (2009, background): “Past habitat loss was assessedusingareclassifiedversionoftheGlobalLandCover2000dataset (72,73) as the percentage of total land area classified as cultivated or managed, mosaics includingcropland,andurbanareas.”
- Pleistocene Park: Does re-wilding North America represent sound conservation for the 21st century? (2006, background): “represent sound conservation for the 21st century?”
- Turkey's globally important biodiversity in crisis (2011, neutral): “4 in Hoekstra et al., 2005).”
- Status of a protected area system in the Hindu Kush-Himalayas: An analysis of PA coverage (2008, background): “The majority of conservation priorities reflect the view of the HKH as a key region of biodiversity (Bryant et al. 1997; Mittermeier et al. 1997, 2004; Olson and Dinerstein 2002; Myers et al. 2000; Eken et al. 2004; Hoekstra et al. 2005; Ricketts et al. 2005; Langhammer et al. 2007).”
- High and Far: Biases in the Location of Protected Areas (2009, result): “’s [16] results, which showed a clear bias in protection towards certain biomes and ecoregions.”
- Predicting extinction risk of butterflies and moths (Macrolepidoptera) from distribution patterns and species characteristics (2007, background): “…larger proportion of the day-active species are associated with vanishing habitat types (i.e., semi-improved grasslands and especially dry unfertilised grasslands) (van Swaay et al. 1999; Hoekstra et al. 2005), and butterflies might be less mobile compared with night-active species (Nieminen 1996).”
- The Palaearctic steppe biome: a new synthesis (2016, background): “In consequence the percentage of pristine and protected habitat is lower in temperate grasslands than in any other major ecosystem type (Henwood 1998; Hoekstra et al. 2005).”
- Emerging issues and challenges in conservation of biodiversity in the rangelands of Tanzania (2013, background): “Indeed, the declining European semi-natural grasslands are associated with a unique set of species that since long has been adapted to these habitats (Hoekstra et al. 2005).”
- Conservation science: a 20‐year report card (2006, methodology): “For each of the biomes of the © The Ecological Society of America www.frontiersinecology.org world (Figure 1a), Hoekstra et al. (2005) calculated a conservation risk index (CRI) value based on the ratio of the percentage of converted land to the percentage of protected land within each biome.”
- Spontaneous succession in limestone quarries as an effective restoration tool for endangered arthropods and plants (2010, background): “Given the rapid losses of temperate biodiversity (e.g. Hoekstra et al. 2005; Wenzel et al. 2006), and given that nutrient-poor and disturbance-dependent biotopes such as grasslands, heaths and rocks are among those most seriously affected, the prevalence of technical reclamation schemes over…”