The NEO-FFI: emerging British norms and an item-level analysis suggest N, A and C are more reliable than O and E
By Vincent Egan, Ian J. Deary, Elizabeth J. Austin. 2000
139 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e50b55ba3d36516cd969a6219299472649a41aee
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- R. McCrae
- Paul T. Costa
- Vincent Egan
- Elizabeth J. Austin
- Ian J. Deary
- Sharon Jakobwitz
- J. Watson
- Caroline Logan
In Social Psychology
- Paul T. Costa
- R. McCrae
- Vincent Egan
- Elizabeth J. Austin
- Ian J. Deary
- J. Watson
- Caroline Logan
- R. Newby
Citations in the corpus
- A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (2004, methodology): “Both item response theory methods (Reise & Henson, 2000) and confirmatory factor analysis (Egan et al., 2000) have been used to evaluate NEO-PI-R items.”
- The Five Factor Model of personality and evaluation of drug consumption risk (2015, background): “The study’s sample was found to be significantly biased in comparison with the general population [11, 30].”
- Critique of the five-factor model of personality (2008, unknown): “hand, Egan et al. (2000) subjected NEO-FFI data derived from a large sample (N =”
- The dark triad and normal personality traits (2006, background): “This modification was required following the discovery that not all scales of the NEO-FFI had equally stable structures (e.g. Egan, Deary, & Austin, 2000 ).”
- Individual differences in response scale use: Mixed Rasch modelling of responses to NEO-FFI items (2006, background): “All raw and corrected score intercorrelations are significant, replicating the common finding that NEO-FFI trait scores are not totally independent of one another ( Egan et al., 2000 ).”
- Big Five or Big Two? Superordinate factors in the NEO Five Factor Inventory and the Antisocial Personality Questionnaire (2004, background): “Egan, Deary, and Austin (2000), for example, found highly significant negative correlations of N with E and C, and a positive correlation between the latter.”
- Biological sex, stereotypical sex‐roles, and SME owner characteristics (2005, result): “These results are consistent with the known outcome that females score each of the Big Five dimensions higher than males ( Egan et al. , 2000”