Big Five or Big Two? Superordinate factors in the NEO Five Factor Inventory and the Antisocial Personality Questionnaire
By R. Blackburn, S. Renwick, J. Donnelly, Caroline Logan. 2004
86 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/195b26a744fb69f70aab51db8152480c1a329cec
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Higher-order factors in a five-factor personality inventory and its relation to social desirability (2007, background): “Much research in this tradition has used aggregated factors (Digman, 1997; Blackburn et al., 2004).”
- The Big Five Personality Traits in the Political Arena (2011, background): “Although some scholars find evidence of more (Ashton & Lee 2005, Paunonen & Jackson 2000) or fewer (Blackburn et al. 2004, Musek 2007) factors, most analyses identify five: Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability (sometimes referred to by its inverse—Neuroticism), and…”
- Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. (2007, background): “Digman (1997) showed that the Big Five personality dimensions can be organized into two themes or superfactors, namely, personal growth (agency) and socialization (communion; see also Blackburn, Renwick, Donnelly, & Logan, 2004; Saragovi, Aube´, Koestner, & Zuroff, 2002).”