NGA Project Strong-Motion Database
By B. Chiou, R. Darragh, N. Gregor, W. Silva. 2008
817 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Geophysics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e4b9a5ed3f838da72a8f3169a01be3268c4d3c2c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Civil and Structural Engineering
In Geophysics
Citations in the corpus
- A Comparison of Ground Motion Prediction Equations for Arias Intensity and Cumulative Absolute Velocity Developed Using a Consistent Database and Functional Form (2012, methodology): “ARIAS INTENSITY GROUND MOTION PREDICTION EQUATION The database used in this study is the same subset of the PEER-NGA strong motion database (Chiou et al. 2008) that we used to develop our GMPE for CAV (Campbell and Bozorgnia 2010).”
- An 8 month slow slip event triggers progressive nucleation of the 2014 Chile megathrust (2017, methodology): “PROGRESSIVE NUCLEATION OF MEGATHRUST 4048 used to compute the spectra [Boore et al., 2012; Chiou et al., 2008].”
- A Ground Motion Prediction Equation for the Horizontal Component of Cumulative Absolute Velocity (CAV) Based on the PEER-NGA Strong Motion Database (2010, methodology): “DATABASE The database used in this study is the same subset of the PEER-NGA strong motion database (Chiou et al. 2008) that we used to develop our NGA-West empirical GMPEs (Campbell and Bozorgnia 2007, 2008).”
- Orientation-independent, nongeometric-mean measures of seismic intensity from two horizontal components of motion (2010, methodology): “GMRotI50 was adopted for use in the ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs) developed as part of the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) center’s Next Generation Attenuation of Ground Motions (NGA) project (Chiou et al., 2008).”
- BC Hydro Ground Motion Prediction Equations for Subduction Earthquakes (2016, methodology): “The useable period range was determined for each recording based on the corner frequencies of the filters used in the processing: the minimum usable frequency was set at 1.2 times the corner frequency of the high-pass filter (Chiou et al. 2008).”
- Considering Spatial Correlation in Mixed-Effects Regression and the Impact on Ground-Motion Models (2010, methodology): “Next Generation Attenuation of Ground Motions (PEER NGA) database (only those records of the CB08 model used by us are considered for compatibility) (Chiou et al., 2008).”
- Preliminary ranking of alternative scalar and vector intensity measures of ground shaking (2015, methodology): “In this study, 137 earthquake ground motions are selected from the next generation of attenuation (NGA) database (Chiou et al. 2008), and used as input for the cloud analysis methodology.”
- Rupture dynamics and ground motion from 3‐D rough‐fault simulations (2013, background): “[35] The rock site recordings that constrain the GMPEs [Chiou et al., 2008] are almost entirely from sites with nearsurface S velocity (Vs30) lower than about 1200m/s and with attenuation parameter k averaging around 0.03–0.04 s [e.g., Boore and Joyner, 1997; Campbell, 2003].”
- Physics-Informed Multi-LSTM Networks for Metamodeling of Nonlinear Structures (2020, methodology): “A synthetic database, consisting of nonlinear time-history responses of the structure (e.g., { u d , ˙ u d } T ), is generated, under excitation of a suite of 97 earthquake records selected from the PEER strong motion database [58] in the area of Pomona, California (latitude, longitude = 34 .”
- An NGA Model for the Average Horizontal Component of Peak Ground Motion and Response Spectra (2008, methodology): “These steps occur at spectral periods where there are large reductions in the number of usable data, defined by the record’s minimum usable frequency (Chiou et al. 2008).”