A Comparison of Ground Motion Prediction Equations for Arias Intensity and Cumulative Absolute Velocity Developed Using a Consistent Database and Functional Form

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Quantification of model uncertainty and variability in Newmark displacement analysis (2018, methodology): “(b): Ia hazard curves using three GEMPs: TBA03 [28], FPS12 [29] and CB12 [30].”
Optimal vector-valued intensity measure for seismic collapse assessment of structures (2015, background): “Additionally, the technical literature includes some GMPEs for predicting AI (e.g., Campbell and Bozorgnia, 2012).”
Ground motion selection for scenario ruptures using the generalised conditional intensity measure (GCIM) method (2015, background): “[26] for SI; Bradley [14] for DSI; Campbell and Bozorgnia [27] for CAV; Campbell and Bozorgnia [28] for AI; 1604 K.”
Spatial Cross‐Correlation Models for Vector Intensity Measures (PGA, I a , PGV, and SAs) Considering Regional Site Conditions (2013, methodology): “In fact, the above matrix is consistent with that obtained by Campbell and Bozorgnia (2012) (the difference is within 0:04) using the PEER-Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) database, which reads R 0 ρPGA;PGA ρPGA;Ia ρPGA;PGV ρPGA;Ia ρIa;Ia ρIa;PGV ρPGA;PGV ρIa;PGV ρPGV;PGV 2 64 3 75 1 0:88…”