A Ground Motion Prediction Equation for the Horizontal Component of Cumulative Absolute Velocity (CAV) Based on the PEER-NGA Strong Motion Database

By K. Campbell, Y. Bozorgnia. 2010

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Geophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a64d7e3353b87a599cb69aae29c555a8af81ab98

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. Brendon Bradley
2. K. Tarbali
3. W. Du
4. Gang Wang
5. J. Bommer
6. Helen Crowley
7. K. Campbell
8. Y. Bozorgnia

In Geophysics

1. Brendon Bradley
2. K. Tarbali
3. J. Bommer
4. Helen Crowley
5. W. Du
6. Gang Wang
7. K. Campbell
8. Y. Bozorgnia

Citations in the corpus

• A Comparison of Ground Motion Prediction Equations for Arias Intensity and Cumulative Absolute Velocity Developed Using a Consistent Database and Functional Form (2012, methodology): “ARIAS INTENSITY GROUND MOTION PREDICTION EQUATION The database used in this study is the same subset of the PEER-NGA strong motion database (Chiou et al. 2008) that we used to develop our GMPE for CAV (Campbell and Bozorgnia 2010).”
• Ground motion selection for scenario ruptures using the generalised conditional intensity measure (GCIM) method (2015, background): “[26] for SI; Bradley [14] for DSI; Campbell and Bozorgnia [27] for CAV; Campbell and Bozorgnia [28] for AI; 1604 K.”
• Correlation of Significant Duration with Amplitude and Cumulative Intensity Measures and Its Use in Ground Motion Selection (2011, background): “These correlations may initially seem rather small given that the definition of CAV implies that it is explicitly dependent on ground motion duration [Campbell and Bozorgnia, 2010].”
• A simple ground‐motion prediction model for cumulative absolute velocity and model validation (2013, methodology): “For this purpose, the PGA predicted from Campbell and Bozorgnia NGA model [9] (termed as CB08) are used and their associated EC and LH scores are listed in Table IV.”
• The Purpose and Definition of the Minimum Magnitude Limit in PSHA Calculations (2017, result): “In this context, it is worth noting that in recent years there has been a trend towards including smaller-magnitude recordings in the derivation of GMPEs, which has led to lower predicted amplitudes at smaller magnitudes (e.g., Chiou et al., 2010; Abrahamson et al., 2014).”