An NGA Model for the Average Horizontal Component of Peak Ground Motion and Response Spectra
1,221 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Geophysics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/535476da9a444cc5159e027056ca85840b708d23
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Civil and Structural Engineering
In Geophysics
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Citations in the corpus
- Ground-motion models for average spectral acceleration in a period range: direct and indirect methods (2017, methodology): “Correlation coefficient estimates (called BJ08) based on the method by Baker and Jayaram (2008) but applied on the residuals of GMPE-SA developed by Chiou and Youngs (2008) using the NGA-West ground motion dataset (Chiou et al. 2008).”
- Empirical Evaluation of Hierarchical Ground‐Motion Models: Score Uncertainty and Model Weighting (2017, background): “Abrahamson and Silva (2008) and Chiou and Youngs (2008) are examples of GMMs with this structure.”
- Empirical estimation of the Newmark displacement from the Arias intensity and critical acceleration (2011, background): “…Taiwan as compared with other worldwide attenuation equations, like NGA models (Next Generation Attenuation project) attenuation equations (Abrahamson and Silva, 2008; Boore and Atkinson, 2008; Campbell and Bozorgnia, 2008; Chiou and Youngs, 2008; Idriss, 2008), especially for short-period motion.”
- Comparisons of the NGA Ground-Motion Relations (2008, methodology): “The models are described in five accompanying papers: Abrahamson and Silva, 2008 (AS08); Boore and Atkinson, 2008 (BA08); Campbell and Bozorgnia, 2008 (CB08); Chiou and Youngs, 2008 (CY08); and Idriss, 2008 (I08).”
- Considering Spatial Correlation in Mixed-Effects Regression and the Impact on Ground-Motion Models (2010, methodology): “Next Generation Attenuation of Ground Motions (PEER NGA) database (only those records of the CB08 model used by us are considered for compatibility) (Chiou et al., 2008).”
- Conditional Spectrum Computation Incorporating Multiple Causal Earthquakes and Ground-Motion Prediction Models (2013, neutral): “For instance, the USGS utilizes three GMPMs (Boore and Atkinson, 2008; Campbell and Bozorgnia, 2008; Chiou and Youngs, 2008) for crustal seismic sources in the WUS (Petersen et al.”
- Correlation model for spatially distributed ground‐motion intensities (2009, methodology): “Incidentally, though the current work only uses the Boore and Atkinson [1] ground-motion model, the results obtained were found to be similar when an alternate model, namely, the Chiou and Youngs [3] model, was used.”
- Correlation of Spectral Acceleration Values from NGA Ground Motion Models (2008, methodology): “The formulation presented in this section has been previously used in various forms by several authors (Abrahamson et al. 2003, Cordova et al. 2001, Pacific Gas & Electric 1988; Shome and Cornell 1999).”
- Selection of Ground Motion Prediction Equations for the Global Earthquake Model (2015, methodology): “All of the models have magnitude-dependent attenuation terms, but a point of differentiation is that some include effective anelastic attenuation leading to steeper attenuation for distances beyond 70-100 km (BA08, CY08, MEA06 and ZEA06) and some do not (AS08, AB10, CB08, FEA10 and KEA06).”
- Quantification of model uncertainty and variability in Newmark displacement analysis (2018, neutral): “(a): PGA hazard curves using four GMPEs: AS08 [24], BA08 [25], CB08 [26] and CY08 [27], respectively.”