An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples)

By S. Shapiro, M. Wilk. 1965

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs (2023, background): “What is the secret word?”
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Testing Statistical Significance in Natural Language Processing (2018, methodology): “For example, the Shapiro-Wilk test (Shapiro and Wilk, 1965) tests the null hypothesis that a sample comes from a normally distributed population, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test quantifies the distance between the empirical distribution function of the sample and the cumulative distribution function of ”
The Effects of Bilateral Tax Treaties on U.S. FDI Activity (2004, methodology): “While our modifications to the CMM framework eliminates systematic trends in our residuals for rich and poor countries, a Shapiro and Wilk (1965) test for normality of the residuals continues to reject the null hypothesis of normality.”
Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk , Kolmogorov-Smirnov , Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests (2011, methodology): “Shapiro and Wilk (1965) test was originally restricted for sample size of less than 50.”
Exclusion techniques reveal significant biotic mortality suffered by Asian citrus psyllid Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) populations in Florida citrus (2009, methodology): “Data were analyzed for normality using the Shaprio-Wilk W test and normality plots using the univariate procedure (Shapiro and Wilk, 1965; Shapiro et al., 1968; SAS Institute, 2004).”
Evaluation of a nutrient starvation model of Mycobacterium tuberculosis persistence by gene and protein expression profiling (2002, methodology): “to test the assumption of normality for each gene (Shapiro and Wilk, 1965).”
Phytoplankton primary production in the world's estuarine-coastal ecosystems (2013, methodology): “3, 4; Shapiro– Wilk testW = 0.780,p < 0.0001; Shapiro and Wilk, 1965), so we used the ratio of median absolute deviation (MAD) to median APPP as a robust index of dispersion (Ruppert, 2011) that can be compared within and between ecosystems.”
Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. (2014, methodology): “Finally, we used the hapiro–Wilk test to check normality (Shapiro and Wilk, 1965).”
Macroscopic and Histological Characterisation of Genes er1 and er2 for Powdery Mildew Resistance in Pea (2006, methodology): “were checked using Shapiro–Wilk s (Shapiro and Wilk, 1965) and Bartlett s tests (Little and Hills, 1972) respectively.”
Real-time bidding for online advertising: measurement and analysis (2013, unknown): “There were less than 1% accepted by either the Shapiro-Wilk test [26] or the Anderson-Darling test [4], regardless of the number of bidders or impressions in that hour.”
The Influence of Environmental Variables on the Distribution and Abundance of Three Elasmobranchs in Tomales Bay, California (2003, methodology): “Normality of the final model residuals was tested using a Shapiro-Wilk statistic (Shapiro & Wilk 1965), and a normal scores plot (Neter et al. 1985).”
Atlasing location, asymmetry and inter-subject variability of white matter tracts in the human brain with MR diffusion tractography (2011, unknown): “In our analysis Gaussian distribution of the data was confirmed for three voxels along the inferior frontooccipital fasciculus using the Shapiro–Wilk test (Shapiro and Wilk, 1965).”
KEEL Data-Mining Software Tool: Data Set Repository, Integration of Algorithms and Experimental Analysis Framework (2011, methodology): “5x2cv-f test [11] Approximate f statistical test for 5x2 cross validation T test [9] Statistical test based on the Student’s t distribution F test [25] Statistical test based on the Snedecor’s F distribution Shapiro-Wilk test [40] Variance test for normality Mann-Whitney U test [27] U statistical te”